Re: R code block produces no output

2019-12-17 Thread Vikas Rawal
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 18:13, William Denton wrote: > On 17 December 2019, Vikas Rawal wrote: > > > A simple code block like the following does not create the graph. > > > > #+NAME: test > > #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output graphics :exports results :file temp.jpg > :width 2400 :height 1200 :res

Re: restore window configuration after org-edit-src-exit

2019-12-17 Thread Jack Kamm
I'd like to add a vote for the old behavior. I only recently noticed the new behavior, and agree with Richard that it's inconvenient. I think many of us missed this change because it wasn't in 9.2. In particular, I'd propose to make the old behavior the default, and hide the new behavior behind

Re: R code block produces no output

2019-12-17 Thread William Denton
On 17 December 2019, Vikas Rawal wrote: A simple code block like the following does not create the graph. #+NAME: test #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output graphics :exports results :file temp.jpg :width 2400 :height 1200 :res 300 :session temp That should be ":results file graphics". Bill --

Re: Help me secure some free time for org-mode in 2020

2019-12-17 Thread Roland Everaert
Hello Bastien, Nice to see you are still alive ;) Sad to read that you plan to stepdown, but, happy to finally have a way to support your work on a regular basis. I hope you will continue to be part of this community even as an humble user ;). And I hope, everything will be better for you in

R code block produces no output

2019-12-17 Thread Vikas Rawal
I have a strange problem and I wonder if there is a new bug. Would appreciate for any help in identifying the problem. A simple code block like the following does not create the graph. #+NAME: test #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output graphics :exports results :file temp.jpg :width 2400 :height 1200

Re: [Nicolò Balzarotti] [bug#38616] emacs: fix odt export

2019-12-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, another...@gmail.com (Nicolò Balzarotti) writes: > The problem happens on ox-odt, when the file OrgOdtStyles.xml > permissions are read-only (this is true especially for Guix and Nix > where all the "store" is readonly). The file gets copied to /tmp/ob-*/ > directory, and is then

Re: Manual Typo in Table Section

2019-12-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Ben Polson writes: > Specifically with this example formula: > ‘@3 = 2 * remote(FOO, @@1$$#)’ > > As I've been playing around with tables and formulas I've come to the > conclusion that '@@1' must be a typo, and that what was intended was just > '@1'. I have a few qualms about this table

Re: restore window configuration after org-edit-src-exit

2019-12-17 Thread Jack Kamm
Sorry for the noise, but I just had another thought: Rather than adding a new option, how about we make the behavior dependent on the value of org-src-window-setup? Basically, when org-src-window-setup is current-window, it never makes sense to restore the original layout. But when

Re: restore window configuration after org-edit-src-exit

2019-12-17 Thread Fraga, Eric
On Tuesday, 17 Dec 2019 at 06:28, Jack Kamm wrote: > Basically, when org-src-window-setup is current-window, it never makes > sense to restore the original layout. But when org-src-window-setup is > reorganize-frame (the default), it always makes sense to restore the > original layout. This makes

Re: Emacs bug 37890; killing capture buffer

2019-12-17 Thread Adam Porter
Hi Michael, Michael Heerdegen writes: > Would you consider to do something like this by default? I guess you're asking me, since I'm the only other person in this thread--but I'm not an Org maintainer, so my opinion isn't very important. IMO, the hooks are worth considering, however they

Re: Babel: Store script in external file

2019-12-17 Thread Berry, Charles
> On Dec 16, 2019, at 1:53 PM, Michael Gauland wrote: > > I've just started playing with #+INCLUDE, so I may not be using it correctly, > but this works for me. Indeed, if what the OP wants is to wrap just that code as a src block and export it and any results it produces during export

Re: Emacs bug 37890; killing capture buffer

2019-12-17 Thread Adam Porter
Michael Heerdegen writes: > Adam Porter writes: > >> I guess you're asking me, since I'm the only other person in this >> thread--but I'm not an Org maintainer, so my opinion isn't very >> important. IMO, the hooks are worth considering, however they should >> be done very, very carefully,

Re: Emacs bug 37890; killing capture buffer

2019-12-17 Thread Michael Heerdegen
Adam Porter writes: > I guess you're asking me, since I'm the only other person in this > thread--but I'm not an Org maintainer, so my opinion isn't very > important. IMO, the hooks are worth considering, however they should be > done very, very carefully, because bad things can happen when

Can Org warn me if I create a time conflict?

2019-12-17 Thread David Rogers
It's currently possible for me to create two meeting times, one from 8:00-10:00 tomorrow and the other from 9:00-11:00 tomorrow. When both are mentioned in the same sentence, as above, it's easy to recognize that the two meetings are probably incompatible. But org-mode allows agenda items to

Re: Emacs bug 37890; killing capture buffer

2019-12-17 Thread Samuel Wales
i might be completely off on this, but it seems the problem is that there is a corrupted buffer. in particular, there is a missing newline at the end of the narrowed region in the capture buffer. this causes the next header to join the last line in the captured buffer. i encountered this

Re: R code block produces no output

2019-12-17 Thread Vikas Rawal
>> That should be ":results file graphics". >> >> > Thanks very much. This works. I guess this has recently changed. I have > always used ":results output graphics" > > > I see that the behaviour changed with 9.3. Release notes ( https://www.orgmode.org/Changes.html) have this: :file header

Re: Emacs bug 37890; killing capture buffer

2019-12-17 Thread Kyle Meyer
Michael Heerdegen writes: > Adam Porter writes: [...] >> I haven't seen your bug report. Was there discussion about it >> previously? > > No, no discussion at all. As I said, it is Emacs bug #37890, this was > my issue: > > | I want to capture an APPT with `org-capture'. I the pop-up buffer

Re: [PATCH] Fix verbatim block fontification to end blocks on headlines

2019-12-17 Thread Tom Gillespie
Hi, Here is the updated patch, including the fix to only trigger on actual headlines (and not bold or similar), the readability improvement for beg-of-next-line and a fix to call point-max only once per branch. I also switched all the regex over to use the rx macro. I left out the tests

Re: Emacs bug 37890; killing capture buffer

2019-12-17 Thread Fraga, Eric
On Tuesday, 17 Dec 2019 at 17:07, Samuel Wales wrote: > i encountered this problem today. i added a task and duplicated it. > this caused the corruption. it also screwed up the stars level, but > never mind that. I've encountered the problem in the past week or two when I was tweaking one of my

Re: Can Org warn me if I create a time conflict?

2019-12-17 Thread Fraga, Eric
On Tuesday, 17 Dec 2019 at 14:05, David Rogers wrote: > Is there any method to get org-mode to alert me (by an error message, > or a red mark in the agenda, or whatever) that I've created a conflict None that I know of. I've trained myself to only create meetings from the agenda view for this

Re: Emacs bug 37890; killing capture buffer

2019-12-17 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Dear Michael, > BTW, what is the canonical place to report org-mode bugs? Emacs bug > reports are not (takes a long time until someone even notices) -- I > thought this list would be good...or is there a better place? @Adam > it's ok if you answer, though I'm a bit disappointed that no one