Le mercredi 4 août 2021, 19:47:11 CEST William Denton a écrit :
> Is there a keystroke to delete a TODO?
I usually use C-c C-x C-w to delete a TODO item.
HTH
Others have already pointed out that you can simply delete the text (one
short-cut: fold the task and then simply delete the whole line...). An
alternative, however, is to delete from the agenda view. At least for
me, C-k is bound to org-agenda-kill which deletes the entry.
--
: Eric S Fraga vi
Le mercredi 4 août 2021, 19:47:11 CEST William Denton a écrit :
> Is there a keystroke to delete a TODO?
I usually use C-c C-x C-w to delete a TODO item.
HTH
Dear Jason,
this is excellent news, thanks for your work! I always wondered why
there is no Org exporter for ConTeXt which seemed such an obvious
target -- can't wait to try it out!
best regards,
András
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 21:44, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Jason Ross writes:
The patch is created for the maint branch.
I have reordered some part of the quoted message.
On 05/08/2021 05:11, Tim Cross wrote:
> I don't think this patch is required, especially since we have not had
> any bug reported relating to that version.
org-agenda.el (and some other files) should be
Hi Maxim,
> Restore compatibility with Emacs-24.3.
FYI Emacs 24 is no longer Org’s minimum version, from the next release onward
it will be Emacs 25.
All the best,
Timothy
>> Maybe I've been using the archiving not as intended, but I don't see
>> any other command for getting rid of a TODO. I can't find a command
>> to delete the current task. Am I missing something? Is there a
>> keystroke to delete a TODO? Or does everyone archive everything?
> If you would l
Dear list,
I am needing to export a document, written in org using the new cite
syntax, to pandoc (native). The export fails. I realise that org-cite
is new and I don't expect the export to process any [cite:@key] lines
properly but it would be good to have the export at least generate a
pandoc
Yeah, ideally ox-pandoc would be updated to support org-cite.
I also, FYI, submitted an issue to pandoc awhile ago to update it's
org-cite support (it has support for an early draft).
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/7329
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 10:07 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 10:13, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Yeah, ideally ox-pandoc would be updated to support org-cite.
Indeed but even exporting without error would be good, assuming of
course that the error I reported is actually due to org-cite. It might
not be; I've never exported to pandoc b
On 5 August 2021, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Le mercredi 4 août 2021, 19:47:11 CEST William Denton a écrit :
Is there a keystroke to delete a TODO?
I usually use C-c C-x C-w to delete a TODO item.
Aha, merci beaucoup, and to Hanno Perrey too. I use org-cut-subtree so rarely
I'd forgotten ab
Perhaps a useful workaround would be to first "export to Org" (with
org-org-export-as-org)?
AFAICS this replaces the Org cites with their export
processor-rendered counterparts, e.g.,
with suitable Natbib cite commands when the
#+cite_export: natbib
line is used.
best regards,
András
On Thu, 5 Au
On 05/08/2021 19:12, André A. Gomes wrote:
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ Store them in the capture property list."
(org-capture-put-target-region-and-position)
(goto-char position))
(_ (error "Cannot find target ID \"%s\"" id
- (`(file+headline ,path ,headline)
Eric S Fraga writes:
> In starting to debug this, I decided to make sure the structure of my
> file was okay so I invoked =org-lint= which then fails with back trace:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (search-failed "^[ \11]*#\\+[A-Za-z]+: + *$")
This looks like some really badly parsed part of
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 17:00, András Simonyi wrote:
> Perhaps a useful workaround would be to first "export to Org" (with
> org-org-export-as-org)?
Excellent suggestion! Thank you.
Doing so clearly indicates that my problem is *not* with org-cite but
with ox-pandoc. Strange.
I had mention
After some investigation...
It seems that the presence of the #+bibliography: line is what causes
ox-pandoc to fail. Removing this line is sufficient for me to get the
export working.
Thanks again,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest paper written i
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 10:41 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
> This is for a journal that expects submissions in pandoc (never had this
> before) which (in
> some ways) is nice as at least it's not Word...
Never heard of that before either; very cool!
Bruce
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 11:29, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Never heard of that before either; very cool!
See my update... markdown, not pandoc. Although pandoc's native
format is quite useful, just not readable. ;-)
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest pap
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 15:41, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> that expects submissions in pandoc (never had this before) which (in
Ignore this, by the way; I meant to type markdown, not pandoc.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest paper written in org: https://a
By the way, ox-md also fails if there is a #+bibliography
line. Removing it allows for the export. Very strange.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096
___
EmacsConf 2021
Online Conference
___
November 27 and 28, 2021
Table of Contents
_
1. Important dates
2. Talk forma
On 05/08/2021 04:41, Вячеслав Гришин wrote:
Now I don't know if I need to do something extra, because the
problem arose because of my mistake.
Vyacheslav, you do not need to react to my patch, it is for Org
maintainers. There is neither continuous integration server nor ready to
use configur
Aloha all,
My googling came up empty. Does anyone have such a function?
All the best,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
https://tsdye.online/tsdye
What kind of functionality do you want associated with your citations
(when you run `org-open-at-point` on them)?
Is some or all of it specific to ebib?
Or is it more generic; opening the bib entry, notes, PDFs, etc?
Because the modular nature of org-cite makes it easy to mix-and-match
pieces fr
I want to open the bib entry, something similar to org-ebib-open,
which works on Org mode links.
All the best,
Tom
Bruce D'Arcus writes:
What kind of functionality do you want associated with your
citations
(when you run `org-open-at-point` on them)?
Is some or all of it specific to ebib?
25 matches
Mail list logo