Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
--
No problem! I have some more coming up :-)
I've been looking at getting org-babel to add line directives for
languages that support it.
(c, c++, haskell...). It would make literate programming for these
kinds of languages much
better, and other people have been complaining e.g.
https://paulbatchelo
You want me to do that and send a new patch or are you going
to do it after you apply the patch?
Regards,
Immanuel
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:41 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> immanuel writes:
>
> > When org-edit-src-code is called with org-window-setup equal to
> > 'split-window-below o
You can set the delimiters used for noweb code.
org-babel-noweb-wrap-end and org-babel-noweb-wrap-end.
I think I set them to @@ in shell code.
Immanuel
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ćukasz Stelmach wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything I may try to stop shell syntax hihgliting in code
> blocks
Just going by what I see, not having tried it:
(setq haskell-process-args-stack-ghci (list "--ghci-options"
"-XFlexibleContexts"))
In your version the process gets 1 argument (with a space in it). In
my version it gets 2 args.
Immanuel
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:22 PM Roger Mason wrote:
>
> Hello
I think the org way of tangling just doesn't work well for compiled languages.
Here are some reasons:
- Not possible to tangle all code going to a specified file
- Not possible to add line directives without major surgery
- Not all language modes do the correct thing
- No way to prevent overwriting
(defun org-babel-plantuml-make-body (body params)
"Return PlantUML input string.
BODY is the content of the source block and PARAMS is a property list
of source block parameters. This function relies on the
`org-babel-expand-body:generic' function to extract `:var' entries
from PARAMS and on th
c".
Weren't there supposed to be maintainers for this stuff? Has no plantuml
maintainer been found?
Immanuel
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:28 AM Heinz Tuechler wrote:
>
> Immanuel Litzroth wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 15.11.2020 13:27:
> > (defun org-babel-plantuml-make
I don't think org-babel is a good fit for compiled languages. If the
idea is to just take 1 snippet,
and "execute" that it means that to have a consistent whole you'd need
to put all the modules of
your program into that snippet (already impossible in Haskell, you can
have only 1 module per file),
ision
> Haskell made with their REPL and babel really can't do much about it, I
> suppose. The Haskell .lhs literate option is interesting. Yes, I'd like to
> see your tangle option, please.
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 4:28 AM Immanuel Litzroth
> wrote:
>>
>>
It's possible to let tangling generate comments that will link back to the
literate file where you defined the function.
https://orgmode.org/manual/Extracting-Source-Code.html
See the comment header arg.
Then you could advise the relevant functions that do emacs function lookup
to check whether th
e from is impossible, if the language
even supports #line and #file directives (Rust still doesn't).
Immanuel Litzroth
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 6:38 PM Martin Jerabek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I recently started to use Org Babel for C++ programs. One of the programs
> outputs sev
Same problem here -- seeing mistakes in latex/pdf generation.
i
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dominik Schrempf
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I wanted to chime in here, because sometimes I do have a similar
> problem.
>
> Whenever I export to LaTeX + PDF, it is pretty difficult to see if the
> compilation
I don't think there is an arg for that. I have written a tangler that
reuses a lot
of the org-babel machinery and has a more flexible mechanism to decide what
to do with the tangled code -- I use it for example to not write a
tangled file if it
hasn't changed, meaning that it will not trigger recom
ion nor examples, but it is mentioned at
> https://orgmode.org/manual/Extracting-Source-Code.html#Hooks-3
>
> --Diego
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 1:31 PM Immanuel Litzroth
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think there is an arg for that. I have written
e aspect-oriented programming/tangling when I
find the time.
Immanuel
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 4:11 PM Diego Zamboni wrote:
>
> Agree. It should be possible to make the hook file-local, but still it's not
> trivial to have good control over where and how the changes are made.
>
&g
Immanuel Litzroth
wrote:
>
> Well I solved the problem by writing a tangler which can be configured
> with tangle-config
> you define a tangler by making a hash "language" -> tangle-hooks. The
> tangle-hooks are
> called at beginning of tangling, on each source block, on
o have good control over where and how the changes are made.
>
> --Diego
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:51 PM Immanuel Litzroth
> wrote:
>>
>> There's that, but you're not gonna do much with that since it is
>> global to emacs. If you're brimming
You can choose which delimiters signal noweb.
see the documentation of org-babel-noweb-wrap-start and
org-babel-noweb-wrap-end.
Immanuel
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:35 PM Sebastian Miele
wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> The noweb syntax seems to clash with the syntax of here documents in
> shell scripts. In
19 matches
Mail list logo