Hi,
I simply cannot ignore this opportunity to expose my utter Org Mode ignorance!
Emmanuel > ... and how to use it with captions, labels and cross-references.
I have tried using the code-splicing functionality with some success; The
result from one source code block "foo", can be inserted
Tim wrote:
> This could just be me, but recently, I'm becoming very concerned
> about the growth of additional features and options in org mode.
Count me in. I have been mostly been hanging around in the shadows, but this is
serious enough for me to wave a flag on the right side.
I would go as
Hi,
I must confess I haven't followed all the nooks and crannies of this subject,
but when I browsed through the latest batch of contributions, I noticed that
one simple (=crude) workaround hasn't been mentioned; Indirect buffers.
If one uses one indirect buffer per language, it should be
Hi Ypo and the rest of you all,
> After some years of using orgmode, and exporting using its defaults, I would
> like to take a quality leap and find a way of exporting for life. My options:
> LaTeX, ODT, HTML.
/.../
> How do you think I should spend some hundreds (or thousands) of hours to
>
Hi,
Just a remark about what Martin Steffen wrote:
> There is one case where I do NOT use org for such documents (though I
> use org basically most things I do), and that is
>
> collaborative editing,
>
> /.../ one can easily
> mess it up (typically for novices, who start changing layout or
>
Martin Steffen wrote:
> I cannot imagine
> that publishers would prescibe ``this is the org-settings and features
> you as author must to use to publish with us''.
If anyone, then the IEEE. In the late 80s, their instructions to authors
included a mindboggling number of allowable DTP-program
Hi,
I recently read about the #+STARTUP parameter "hideblocks", but it doesn't seem
to have any effect in my set-up. All the blocks kept laughing straight in my
face. :-(
Any ideas about what could have gone wrong?
I use Org Mode 9.4.5 with Emacs 26.3, and I also tried closing the file and
Hi,
George> Aside from any official movement, I would like to add this to my own
files - is there a straightforward way to extend the org parser to do this?
Quick and Dirty: Bind key '`' to ~ in Emacs?
(I guess it is clear I haven't thought about the consequences.)
Cheers
Rasmus
> > I would like to submit that org consider adopting backticks as an alternate
> > way of denoting inline code.
>
> Just FYI, this is almost certainly not going to happen.
Perhaps as unlikely as Python adopts 'i' instead of 'j' in complex numbers? It
looks awful for all but electrical and
> I just noticed that some of us here, when replying, include the email of
> the sender of the previous email in the response as part of body of the
> email.
/.../
> I suggest refraining from doing so, and instead use the name.
Good idea!
Cheers
Rasmus
Hi all,
I have tried to use SymPy in Org Mode code blocks, export LaTeX
expressions to displayed equations, and refer to those with
labels. My current solution is ugly, which has left me with a
strong feeling that there must be a better way.
Sensitive Org Mode users are warned. Here comes a
I vote against backticks, since I think we can learn to live with some
diversity. Running with the crowd, the latest fashion, would, in the end, leave
us with something like Word and Windows, that is, something which is
seductively easy to use the first two days, but a pain in the neck the rest
Kyle> Are you leaving org-startup-folded at showeverything
Yes I do.
Kyle> That will prevent org-startup-folded and "#+startup:
Kyle> hideblocks" from having an effect:
I must admit I was pig ignorant of that.
Kyle> For example, try this:
Specifying "#+startup: nofold" together with
Ian wrote:
> When the paragraph first introduces the term “live code
> block”, it’s italicized. I think it should stay italicized
> for the rest of that paragraph since it’s the introduction
> of the term
I am not one of the authors of the manual, but my impression, after spending
most of my
Hi,
Uwe wrote:
> I am not entirely convinced by this mode and now came across
> virtual-auto-fill-mode that looks to me a much nicer solution.
> Any comments?
I haven't tried virtual-a-f-m myself, so I cannot say if it is
the ultimate solution. However, I have tried visual-fill-column-
mode
Dear all,
Here comes a minor gripe.
If I start with:
-
#+TODO: foo bar | baz
+ [X] Apple
+ [ ] Banana
...and then apply org-toggle-headline (C-c *) on the two items,
one after the other, I end up with these headlines:
* DONE Apple
** TODO Banana
> Org 9.5 is out, available from GNU ELPA.
I bow to the ground in utter and humble gratitude!
> Enjoy!
I will, that is as certain as taxes and death!
Cheers
Rasmus
Hi all,
I have really seen forward to the release of org mode 9.5 with
its new and shiny support for citations. The initial frenzy of
experimentation has lead to mixed results.
Right now I am trying to use the biblatex processor, but I only
get "Unknown processor biblatex". How is that even
> Note the thread I posted a day or two ago /.../
Thanks I will, and I will also try to remember to search the mail
archives the next time around.
Yours
Rasmus
Hi,
If org mode won't blow up, kick out the restriction.
It is not up to us to decide what users will have use for or not. Besides, if
someone specifies an outrageously wide picture by mistake, it's a mistake which
is easy to spot and fix.
I finish my argument with a small war story. Many
> /.../ the elpa-mirror package helps out for the "niche" of
> users who need to deploy the extensions on machines that do
> not have access to the internet.
I found out about and used elpa-mirror when I worked in
Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). Its connection with the net
was somewhat
Hi,
I recently used oc-basic and oc-csl but ran into a slight problem when I tried
to cite
"97 Things Every Programmer Should Know — Collective Wisdom from the Experts",
1st ed.; Henney, K., Ed.; O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2010.
...with the command org-cite-insert. Typing "Henney" produced no
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 2nd, 2021 at 4:24 PM, Robert Pluim
wrote:
>> autofrettage> any kind of rower = Ruder*in
>
> But with the 'female' suffix? Thatʼs almost as bad as 'écriture
> inclusi
Someone brought up edge and corner cases, so I simply have to mention the
German gender stars ("Gendersternchen").
In an effort to make German gender neutral, some individuals use '*' in the
midst of some words, e.g. rower.
Ordinary German:
male rower = Ruderer
female rower = Ruderin
Gender
> When I export an Org file to LaTeX and finally PDF, the code blocks and
> quotes often exceed the width of the page.
> Is it possible to set some style of the exported blocks ?
I wonder what the export engine can do about code which is too wide? As a
programmer, I certainly wouldn't like
Call me old-fashioned if you like, but when I see efforts like org-modern, I
cannot help but thinking about Neo in Matrix. It was his ability to see the
source code, which gave him his god-like powers.
I therefore draw the line at (conventional) syntax highlighting.
(I am painfully aware my
Rudolf wrote:
> Further, \(\) brings 100% more characters than $$, resulting in more noise in
> the sentence.
Now where did I put my APL keyboard...
Cheers
Rasmus
Dear all,
I skimmed through most of the answers, so forgive me if the following has
already been said.
The question triggers an old LaTeX reflex; If the layout tweak or typography
tune turns out to be very difficult to accomplish with LaTeX (including all the
mainstream add-ons), then the
28 matches
Mail list logo
