[Emacs-orgmode] Re: Midnight and noon in agendas
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Jun 2, 2006, at 19:24, Christian Schlauer wrote: Also, 26:00 is against the rules ;-) That is certainly true, but I see no reason to explicitly forbid them. Of course not! The format is unusual, but very useful. This is something that can be easily left at a users discretion, don't you agree? I do. Also, I like how it will look in the agenda: +h:mm. -- Christian Schlauer ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Emacs-orgmode] Re: Midnight and noon in agendas
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Should 12am be listed as 0:00 or as 24:00? Should 12:21am be listed as 0:21 or as 24:21? I vote for 0:00 and 0:21 Dave in Largo, FL ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Emacs-orgmode] Re: Midnight and noon in agendas
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to me that the logic would be a bit better to schedule these show uo as 0:00 and 0:21. If you wanted to put something at midnight at the end of the day you would then have to use 24:00 and 24:21. Opinions? That would have the nice effect of giving people more hours in a day. I'm sure everyone could use that. :^) -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | IRC: mwolson on freenode.net: #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG |_] | \| |_| Project involvement: Emacs, Muse, Planner, ERC, EMMS pgpvEjPko2PAH.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: Midnight and noon in agendas
On Jun 2, 2006, at 16:11, Michael Olson wrote: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to me that the logic would be a bit better to schedule these show uo as 0:00 and 0:21. If you wanted to put something at midnight at the end of the day you would then have to use 24:00 and 24:21. Opinions? That would have the nice effect of giving people more hours in a day. I'm sure everyone could use that. :^) Yes, indeed a funny effect. However, it can be useful to schedule something at 24:21 or even at 26:00 or so. because if you put such a date on your agenda for the next day, you might find out too late - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
