Re: [O] Inactive timestamps in planning types?
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > probably the question, but Org-mode allows to write down (and parse and > export) combinations of timestamps and planning info that are correct > syntax but make no sense either. Can you point at such a combinaison and at some real bug/problem that can emerge from it? Thanks in advance, -- Bastien
Re: [O] Inactive timestamps in planning types?
Bastien writes: Hi Bastien, > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> can inactive timestamps appear in >> >> - title-stamps (the timestamps attached to headlines) > > Yes. > >> - planning types like deadline, scheduled and closed > > No. Thx >> It does not seem to make much sense to me, but maybe I'm overlooking >> something. > > I'm not sure what does not make sense, if it's the question or the > possible answers :) probably the question, but Org-mode allows to write down (and parse and export) combinations of timestamps and planning info that are correct syntax but make no sense either. In other contexts than plain-text buffers one would probably restrict possible user-input to what makes sense, but its not always obvious what makes sense and what not with so many possibilities ... -- cheers, Thorsten
Re: [O] Inactive timestamps in planning types?
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > can inactive timestamps appear in > > - title-stamps (the timestamps attached to headlines) Yes. > - planning types like deadline, scheduled and closed No. > It does not seem to make much sense to me, but maybe I'm overlooking > something. I'm not sure what does not make sense, if it's the question or the possible answers :) -- Bastien
[O] Inactive timestamps in planning types?
Hi List, can inactive timestamps appear in - title-stamps (the timestamps attached to headlines) - planning types like deadline, scheduled and closed ? It does not seem to make much sense to me, but maybe I'm overlooking something. -- cheers, Thorsten
