Re: [O] LaTeX export section level cutoff?

Thanks a lot! -- Christian --- On Mon, May 06 2019, William Denton wrote: On 6 May 2019, Christian Lynbech wrote: > What determines at what level LaTeX export goes from sections to > enumerations? According to this, by default it's three

Re: [O] LaTeX export section level cutoff?

On 6 May 2019, Christian Lynbech wrote: What determines at what level LaTeX export goes from sections to enumerations? According to this, by default it's three levels of sections, then it turns into lists: https://orgmode.org/org.html#LaTeX-header-and-sectioning But H in the export

[O] LaTeX export section level cutoff?

What determines at what level LaTeX export goes from sections to enumerations? I am using `report', the definition of which looks like this: ("report" "\\documentclass[11pt]{report}" ("\\part{%s}" . "\\part*{%s}") ("\\chapter{%s}" . "\\chapter*{%s}")

Re: [O] [latex export/babel] pass arguments to \includegraphics from code blocks

Am 22.04.19 um 21:13 schrieb Nick Dokos: Jakob Schöttl writes: Hi, I want to use code blocks to generate and include images of sheet music: #+BEGIN_SRC lilypond :file test.png :exports results \header{tagline=""} { a b c } #+END_SRC When doing a latex export the result is: \begin{center}

Re: [O] [latex export/babel] pass arguments to \includegraphics from code blocks

Jakob Schöttl writes: > Hi, I want to use code blocks to generate and include images of sheet music: > > #+BEGIN_SRC lilypond :file test.png :exports results > \header{tagline=""} > { a b c } > #+END_SRC > > > When doing a latex export the result is: > > \begin{center} >

[O] [latex export/babel] pass arguments to \includegraphics from code blocks

Hi, I want to use code blocks to generate and include images of sheet music: #+BEGIN_SRC lilypond :file test.png :exports results \header{tagline=""} { a b c } #+END_SRC When doing a latex export the result is: \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=.9\linewidth]{test.png} \end{center} Is

[O] Latex export from org-download images with spaces fails

Hello mailing list, when I use org-download to take a screenshot and automatically import the image into my org document it often contains spaces (because the overlying headline contains spaces and the image gets saved in a folder with the same name). org-download seems to use URL encoding when

Re: [O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Hello, Dominik Schrempf writes: > I tried to follow your suggestions. Please let me know, if the patch > is OK like this. Applied, with some changes to the commit message. Thank you. > The patch only adds one footnote. It is unfortunate, that all > subsequent footnotes are changed too. This

Re: [O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Hello, I tried to follow your suggestions. Please let me know, if the patch is OK like this. The patch only adds one footnote. It is unfortunate, that all subsequent footnotes are changed too. Best, Dominik >From 4b97952b0d6d218de7d7cab6f7017f87b68b966c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominik

Re: [O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Hello, Dominik Schrempf writes: > Oh thanks, > > I thought it would be good to add a comment to the Org mode manual although it > is of course not really Org mode related. > > I decided that a good location would be >

Re: [O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Oh thanks, I thought it would be good to add a comment to the Org mode manual although it is of course not really Org mode related. I decided that a good location would be https://orgmode.org/manual/Math-formatting-in-HTML-export.html#Math-formatting-in-HTML-export A proposed patch is

Re: [O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Dominik Schrempf writes: > so I found the reason. Both Org versions behave the same, sorry for the > confusion. The original equation that does not get exported correctly > contained > angles: > > \begin{equation} > = \frac{\sum_i w_i k_{eff}(i)}{\sum_i w_i}. > \end{equation} > > This

Re: [O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Am 13.09.18 um 15:31 schrieb Dominik Schrempf: > so I found the reason. Both Org versions behave the same, sorry for the > confusion. The original equation that does not get exported correctly > contained > angles: > > \begin{equation} >   = \frac{\sum_i w_i k_{eff}(i)}{\sum_i w_i}. >

Re: [O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Hi, so I found the reason. Both Org versions behave the same, sorry for the confusion. The original equation that does not get exported correctly contained angles: \begin{equation} = \frac{\sum_i w_i k_{eff}(i)}{\sum_i w_i}. \end{equation} This equation is correctly rendered when using a

[O] Latex export with \begin{equation}

Hi, I have the following document: \begin{equation} foobar \end{equation} I perform an HTML export. The equation is not rendered with MathJax when using Org Mode 9.1.14 (Spacemacs). The equation is correctly rendered with =emacs -Q=; then, Org Mode 9.1.9 is used. I am sure that Spacemacs

Re: [O] Latex export of figure with multiline caption and label results in additional space

Hello, I'm very sorry I hope this version is parsed correctly: When I use a multiline caption without a label everythings is correct, the two lines are both indented by the same amount #+BEGIN_SRC org #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{caption} #+LATEX_HEADER: \captionsetup{format=hang}

Re: [O] Latex export of figure with multiline caption and label results in additional space

Hello, Max Beutelspacher writes: > I have a problem when I'm exporting a figure with a multiline caption > and a label to pdf via latex. > > Here is an example > #+BEGIN_SRC org +LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{caption} +LATEX_HEADER: > #\captionsetup{format=hang} +NAME: test +CAPTION:Cras placerat

[O] Latex export of figure with multiline caption and label results in additional space

Hi, I have a problem when I'm exporting a figure with a multiline caption and a label to pdf via latex. Here is an example #+BEGIN_SRC org +LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{caption} +LATEX_HEADER: #\captionsetup{format=hang} +NAME: test +CAPTION:Cras placerat #accumsan nulla. Aliquam posuere.

Re: [O] LaTeX export filter

> > > >> >>> (while (string-match >>> "\\(<\\([0-9]+\\)cid\\([0-9]+\\)?>[[:blank:]]*\\([^&]+\\)\\)" row) >> >> Could it be that you need to change the last + to *? >> Haven't tried it, mind you. >> -- > > That does not change the result. Still pick only two. > > Vikas >

Re: [O] LaTeX export filter

> >> >> >>> (while (string-match "\\(<\\([0-9]+\\)cid\\([0-9]+\\)?>[[:blank:]]*\\([^&]+\\)\\)" row) >>> >>> Could it be that you need to change the last + to *? >>> Haven't tried it, mind you. >>> -- >> > > The problem is in this part of the code: > > (while

Re: [O] LaTeX export filter

On Saturday, 24 Mar 2018 at 22:24, Vikas Rawal wrote: > I am trying to write a LaTeX export filter that should replace all > table rows with cells having entries such as <3cid4> by > \cmidrule{lr}{3-4} [...] > (while (string-match >

[O] LaTeX export filter

Let me start by confessing my limited knowledge of lisp. I am trying to write a LaTeX export filter that should replace all table rows with cells having entries such as <3cid4> by \cmidrule{lr}{3-4} The idea is to have a table row of this kind | <2cid3> | <4cid5> |<6cid7>

Re: [O] LaTeX Export

On 08/10/2017 11:35 AM, Richard Lawrence wrote:> Hi Scott, > > Scott Randby writes: > >> I tried this in the properties associated with a subtree: >> :export_latex_header: >>

Re: [O] LaTeX Export

Hi Scott, Scott Randby writes: I tried this in the properties associated with a subtree: :export_latex_header: \hypersetup{pdfauthor={foo},pdftitle={foo},pdfsubject={foo},pdfkeywords={foo},pdfproducer={foo},pdfcreator={foo}} Unfortunately, all the other LaTeX headers

[O] LaTeX Export

I have a file with a large number of top-level headlines. Each subtree corresponding to a top-level headline is exported to its own PDF file. The subtrees all use the same LaTeX headers except for \hypersetup. Right now, I have to uncomment the \hypersetup manually whenever I export a subtree.

[O] LaTeX export of org file uses listings instead of minted, why?

Does this code from the backed-up .emacs interfere with TeX not working with MINTED in the body of the .tex file? Should I eliminate it? I'm thinking of posting all the bits of code where `minted' is mentioned, in the hopes that some of you experts can tell me whether I could eliminate/edit

Re: [O] LaTeX export of org file uses listings instead of minted, why?

Not an answer to the issue you are seeing, but I noticed that you are using Emacs 24.x and Org-mode 8.2.x. The Org-mode version especially is too old. I can only suggest that you update to the latest version of Org-mode mode (9.0.5) (and also that of Emacs (25.2) if you get a chance), so that the

[O] LaTeX export of org file uses listings instead of minted, why?

Hello again, I'm still trying to find out why emacs doesn't pick up MINTED instead of LISTINGS to handle code blocks when exporting files from .org to .pdf, via .tex. I backed-up my previous .emacs file (which had a lot of customization for Beamer, AUCTeX etc.), loaded Nick Dokos' minimal init

Re: [O] LaTeX export of org file uses listings instead of minted, why?

"vendo.li...@libero.it" writes: > Hello there! > I'm having a bit of a problem telling emacs to use MINTED instead of LISTINGS > to handle code blocks > enclosed within #+BEGIN_SRC and #+END_SRC when exporting from an org file. > > I've had to Customize Org Groups using

[O] LaTeX export of org file uses listings instead of minted, why?

Hello there!I'm having a bit of a problem telling emacs to use MINTED instead of LISTINGS to handle code blocks enclosed within #+BEGIN_SRC and #+END_SRC when exporting from an org file. I've had to Customize Org Groups using the GUI menu `Org' but as soon as I close and restart emacs, it goes

Re: [O] LaTeX export hline

Hello, Justen Rickert writes: > LaTeX export for five dashes - exports from org as > \rule{\linewidth}{0.5pt} > which then produces a pdf with a horizontal line having the width of the > paragraph but indented. This means the line extends into the margin by the >

[O] LaTeX export hline

Hello, LaTeX export for five dashes - exports from org as \rule{\linewidth}{0.5pt} which then produces a pdf with a horizontal line having the width of the paragraph but indented. This means the line extends into the margin by the width of the indent. If I do

Re: [O] latex export creates "auto" directory

Hello Takeshi, On Sat, Mar 04 2017, Takeshi Teshima wrote: > I have a question regarding latex export. > > When I export an org-mode to a latex file, a directory named "auto" is > created in the same folder as the tex file. > > However, I couldn't find what line in the source code of org-mode >

Re: [O] latex export creates "auto" directory

On 03/03/17 15:55, Takeshi Teshima wrote: I have a question regarding latex export. When I export an org-mode to a latex file, a directory named "auto" is created in the same folder as the tex file. However, I couldn't find what line in the source code of org-mode creates this directory. Does

Re: [O] latex export creates "auto" directory

Dear Colin, Thank you for that detailed information! I'll try them. Best regards, Takeshi On 2017/03/04 1:37, Colin Baxter wrote: Hello Takeshi, On Sat, Mar 04 2017, Takeshi Teshima wrote: I have a question regarding latex export. When I export an org-mode to a latex file, a directory

Re: [O] latex export creates "auto" directory

Hi Tom, Thank you for the immediate and useful answer! You've saved me a lot of time. Thank you! Best regards, Takeshi On 2017/03/04 1:06, Thomas S. Dye wrote: Aloha Takeshi Teshima, Takeshi Teshima writes: I have a question regarding latex export. When I export an org-mode to a latex file,

Re: [O] latex export creates "auto" directory

Aloha Takeshi Teshima, Takeshi Teshima writes: > I have a question regarding latex export. > > When I export an org-mode to a latex file, a directory named "auto" is > created in the same folder as the tex file. > > However, I couldn't find what line in the source code of org-mode > creates this

[O] latex export creates "auto" directory

I have a question regarding latex export. When I export an org-mode to a latex file, a directory named "auto" is created in the same folder as the tex file. However, I couldn't find what line in the source code of org-mode creates this directory. Does anyone know what causes this, or

Re: [O] Latex export error: There's no line here to end, with an image with a caption

Hello Mr. Goaziou, Thank you for the reply! Wow, thank you. It worked. The problem seems to stem from my own config. It worked as I turned my personal settings off. Best, Takeshi On 2017/01/19 7:38, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, Takeshi Teshima writes:

Re: [O] Latex export error: There's no line here to end, with an image with a caption

Hello, Takeshi Teshima writes: > When I try to export an org-mode file **that contains a figure with > a caption** with `#+OPTIONS: \n:t`, (See minimal example files) > > to a pdf via latex-export, the exported latex file doesn't compile and > I get the following

[O] Latex export error: There's no line here to end, with an image with a caption

Hi all, A happy new year! I have a problem with org-export-to-latex. # What happens ## [1] When I try to export an org-mode file **that contains a figure with a caption** with `#+OPTIONS: \n:t`, (See minimal example files) to a pdf via latex-export, the exported latex file doesn't

Re: [O] Latex export fails for plain lists deeper than four, works for html

Hello, Scott Otterson writes: > Hi Nicolas, thanks for trying to replicate this on Linux. What happens for > you if it doesn't crash? Does the latex export just work and produce a pdf > with a set of properly nested lists? It produces a pdf with improperly nested lists

Re: [O] Latex export fails for plain lists deeper than four, works for html

Hi Nicolas, thanks for trying to replicate this on Linux. What happens for you if it doesn't crash? Does the latex export just work and produce a pdf with a set of properly nested lists? Would you be willing to sent me .tex your latex export produces? It seems unlikely, but maybe org use a

Re: [O] Latex export fails for plain lists deeper than four, works for html

Hello, Scott Otterson writes: > If a plain list has more than four levels, org-mode will produce latex that > crashes. See attached. On the other hand, html export works fine, even > for much deeper lists. > > In a large org file, this export error is pretty time

[O] Latex export fails for plain lists deeper than four, works for html

If a plain list has more than four levels, org-mode will produce latex that crashes. See attached. On the other hand, html export works fine, even for much deeper lists. In a large org file, this export error is pretty time consuming for a naive user (me) to isolate, so I'd like to suggest

Re: [O] latex export: can I add an optional argument to an item?

On Friday, 2 Dec 2016 at 10:35, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Thank you for the suggestion. With macros that makes for a quite elegant > solution. You're welcome. And, yes, with macros, many LaTeX aspects can be incorporated easily without making everything look a mess. -- : Eric S Fraga

Re: [O] latex export: can I add an optional argument to an item?

Hi Eric, On 2016-12-02 09:52, Eric S Fraga writes: > I know you've had some answers but if you want exactly what you > specified in LaTeX, the following will do it: > > * intro > This is a list > - @@latex:[\(\checkmark\)]@@ and so on > - normal item Thank you for the

Re: [O] latex export: can I add an optional argument to an item?

On Thursday, 1 Dec 2016 at 09:04, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to generate the following latex export: > > \begin{itemize} > \item[\Checkmark] foo > \end{itemize} > > I tried both > > -[\Checkmark] > > and > > - [\Checkmark] > > but neither works. > > Is this possible with

Re: [O] latex export: can I add an optional argument to an item?

Hello Richard, On 2016-12-01 11:36, Richard Lawrence writes: >> I would like to generate the following latex export: >> >> \begin{itemize} >> \item[\Checkmark] foo >> \end{itemize} > > It's not exactly pretty, but you can use a description list while > resetting

Re: [O] latex export: can I add an optional argument to an item?

Hi Alan, Alan Schmitt writes: > I would like to generate the following latex export: > > \begin{itemize} > \item[\Checkmark] foo > \end{itemize} It's not exactly pretty, but you can use a description list while resetting it to the itemize environment, like:

[O] latex export: can I add an optional argument to an item?

Hello, I would like to generate the following latex export: \begin{itemize} \item[\Checkmark] foo \end{itemize} I tried both -[\Checkmark] and - [\Checkmark] but neither works. Is this possible with org-mode? Best, Alan -- OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Monthly Athmospheric CO₂,

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > All your "Effort" values are expressed as HH:MM so Org does its best to > produce a HH:MM summary. If you write at least one value as a duration, > e.g., "10 h", the summary will also be expressed as a duration. I see, thank you! ciao, lele. --

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Lele Gaifax writes: > This is the equivalent, made with current master development org-mode: > > # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- > > #+TITLE: Test with current master revision of org-mode > #+COLUMNS: %40ITEM(Item) %13Effort(Effort){:} %CLOCKSUM(Work) > > > * This

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Lele Gaifax writes: > >> One minor issue: previously I used a custom setting for the variable >> `org-time-clocksum-format`, to print something like "2gg 03:10" instead of >> "2d >> 03:10". With the version currently

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Hello, Lele Gaifax writes: > One minor issue: previously I used a custom setting for the variable > `org-time-clocksum-format`, to print something like "2gg 03:10" instead of "2d > 03:10". With the version currently distributed with Emacs 25.1 it was used for > both the

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> Do you know if/when it will be merged into Emacs? > > I don't know, but that will not happen before Emacs 25.1 release. Thanks anyway, I installed latest development sources and I appreciate the work that has been done in this (and many other)

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Hello, Lele Gaifax writes: > Do you know if/when it will be merged into Emacs? I don't know, but that will not happen before Emacs 25.1 release. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Lele Gaifax writes: > >> I know this is an ancient thread, but it seems the problem is still there, in >> Emacs 25. > > "org-colview" was rewritten recently. IIRC, this is fixed in development > version of Org. Great,

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Hello, Lele Gaifax writes: > I know this is an ancient thread, but it seems the problem is still there, in > Emacs 25. "org-colview" was rewritten recently. IIRC, this is fixed in development version of Org. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] latex-export + columnview: misinterpretation of section prefixes as emphasis

Hi all, I know this is an ancient thread, but it seems the problem is still there, in Emacs 25. FWIW, this is my quick and dirty fix, that at least produce a readable output, in Emacs as well as in the PDF output. (require 'org-colview) ;; Quick workaround to

[O] LaTeX export with listings: unknown language "calc"

Hello! I use some calc in my org document: #+begin_SRC calc :var x=5 :var y=2 :exports both 2 + a * x ** y #+end_SRC When I export this to LaTeX the listings package complains about an unknown language calc. To fix this I simply define a language: #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{listings}

Re: [O] LaTeX export with listings: unknown language "calc"

On Saturday, 13 Feb 2016 at 16:35, Axel Kielhorn wrote: > Hello! > > I use some calc in my org document: > > #+begin_SRC calc :var x=5 :var y=2 :exports both > 2 + a * x ** y > #+end_SRC > > When I export this to LaTeX the listings package complains about an > unknown language calc. > > To fix

Re: [O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

John Kitchin writes: >> I do something like this with custom link types. > Aha! I am not the only one ;) > >> >> First of all, have a look at the variable >> >> org-latex-prefer-user-labels > > Is this a new 8.3 variable? It doesn't seem to be in my 8.2.10 MELPA >

Re: [O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

> 03.12.2015, 16:31, "John Kitchin" : > > Try this. > > * Chapter 1 > ** Section 1.1 \label{manual-section-1} > :PROPERTIES: > :CUSTOM_ID: section-1 > :END: > * Chapter 2 > ** Section 2.1 > I want reference to Section 1.1 from here

Re: [O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

Hi Ilya, Ilya writes: > I export my Org-Mode notes with internal links to LaTeX and I want it to > look like this ''Section 1.1 [Section name], page 99'' (Like in the Org > Manual). I use this construction: > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > * Chapter 1 > ** Section 1.1 >

Re: [O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

> I do something like this with custom link types. Aha! I am not the only one ;) > > First of all, have a look at the variable > > org-latex-prefer-user-labels Is this a new 8.3 variable? It doesn't seem to be in my 8.2.10 MELPA version. > > if you haven't already. Setting it will cause Org

Re: [O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

Thank you, it is work, but I hope to use something like (setq org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\ref{%s}") for hyperref customization. (I want join \\ref{%s} and \\pageref{%s} for org-export-latex-hyperref-format). If it will be work we may simple use [[#section-1]] to different templates for

[O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

I export my Org-Mode notes with internal links to LaTeX and I want it to look like this ''Section 1.1 [Section name], page 99'' (Like in the Org Manual). I use this construction: #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE * Chapter 1 ** Section 1.1 :PROPERTIES: :CUSTOM_ID: section-1 :END: * Chapter 2 **

Re: [O] Latex export: How to handle multiple authors, emails, institutes

On Thursday, 26 Nov 2015 at 16:26, Fatma Başak Aydemir wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to write a conference paper which has multiple authors from > multiple institues. I tried to insert author infor by adding the > following block > > #+BEGIN_LaTeX > \author{First Author\inst{1}, Second

Re: [O] Latex export: How to handle multiple authors, emails, institutes

I have also done something like this for different journals here: https://github.com/jkitchin/jmax/blob/master/ox-manuscript.el#L64 Eric S Fraga writes: > On Thursday, 26 Nov 2015 at 16:26, Fatma Başak Aydemir wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to write a conference paper which has multiple

[O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

I export my Org-Mode notes with internal links to LaTeX and I want it to look like this ''Section 1.1 [Section name], page 99'' (Like in the Org Manual). I use this construction: #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE * Chapter 1 ** Section 1.1 :PROPERTIES: :CUSTOM_ID: section-1 :END: * Chapter 2 **

Re: [O] LaTeX export with section number, name and page in internal links

Try this. * Chapter 1 ** Section 1.1 \label{manual-section-1} :PROPERTIES: :CUSTOM_ID: section-1 :END: * Chapter 2 ** Section 2.1 I want reference to Section 1.1 from here (See Section \ref{manual-section-1} on page \pageref{manual-section-1}) John

[O] Latex export: How to handle multiple authors, emails, institutes

Hi all, I'm trying to write a conference paper which has multiple authors from multiple institues. I tried to insert author infor by adding the following block #+BEGIN_LaTeX \author{First Author\inst{1}, Second Author\inst{1}, Third Author\inst{2}} \authorrunning{Author et al.}

Re: [O] Latex export: How to handle multiple authors, emails, institutes

Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 26 nov. 2015 à 16:26, Fatma Başak Aydemir a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to write a conference paper which has multiple authors from > multiple institues. I tried to insert author infor by adding the following > block > > #+BEGIN_LaTeX

Re: [O] Latex export: How to handle multiple authors, emails, institutes

Aloha Fatma Başak Aydemir, Fatma Başak Aydemir writes: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to write a conference paper which has multiple authors from > multiple institues. I tried to insert author infor by adding the > following block > > #+BEGIN_LaTeX > \author{First

Re: [O] Latex export: How to handle multiple authors, emails, institutes

Aloha! Both solutions work for me. I went for adding the code line by line using #+LATEX_HEADER for I do not collaborate with the same co-authors all the time so I did not want to permanenetly add the configuration to my setup. Thanks! 26/11/15 16:59 tarihinde Thomas S. Dye yazdı: Aloha

Re: [O] Latex export or Latex tangle? Best practice?

On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: In a previous post I was getting at the issue of whether I should just do regular export or use latex code blocks for what I wanted in a final document. What I want is the ability to create a big, rambling, annotated org file -- with keeper stuff

[O] Latex export or Latex tangle? Best practice?

In a previous post I was getting at the issue of whether I should just do regular export or use latex code blocks for what I wanted in a final document. What I want is the ability to create a big, rambling, annotated org file -- with keeper stuff inside the latex babel blocks -- then tangle the

Re: [O] Latex export or Latex tangle? Best practice?

I would use LaTeX code blocks when I need to write something in LaTeX that isn't easy to write in org mode, not to distinguish what is a note and what is part of the draft. For that I recommend comments, e.g., ### Start example ### * Section 1 ** COMMENT Some rough draft notes to myself yadda

Re: [O] LaTeX export and org-add-link-type

Leonard Avery Randall wrote: Serge Cohen writes: Is this normal, if so is there another way to obtain the same results as what is proposed in the documentation ? The behaviour you are explaining is not normal. The setup you described should work. To complete the post : I am using Aquamacs

[O] LaTeX export and org-add-link-type

Hello list, When using hte org to LaTeX exporter, I would like to use the link-type capabilities described here : http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/examples/article-class.html#sec-3 To follow the instruction, I have added the lines to my ~/.emacs.el (org-add-link-type ltx nil (lambda

Re: [O] LaTeX export and org-add-link-type

Hi Serge, Serge Cohen writes: Is this normal, if so is there another way to obtain the same results as what is proposed in the documentation ? The behaviour you are explaining is not normal. The setup you described should work. To complete the post : I am using Aquamacs (MacOSX

Re: [O] LaTeX export problem

Hello, t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: With a recent Org from git and this source: #+attr_latex: :width 0.8\textwidth :placement [htb] #+name: fig:harris-errors #+caption[Structural effects of false transitives]: Structural effects of false transitives with the stratigraphic

Re: [O] LaTeX export problem

Aloha Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes: Hello, t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: With a recent Org from git and this source: #+attr_latex: :width 0.8\textwidth :placement [htb] #+name: fig:harris-errors #+caption[Structural effects of false transitives]:

[O] LaTeX export problem

Aloha all, With a recent Org from git and this source: #+attr_latex: :width 0.8\textwidth :placement [htb] #+name: fig:harris-errors #+caption[Structural effects of false transitives]: Structural effects of false transitives with the stratigraphic section in Figure [[fig:fig12-open]]:

[O] latex export for 4th-level heading

When exporting to LaTeX, fourth-level headings become \enumerate. In LaTeX, the item below \subsubsection is \paragraph, not \enumerate. Here is what happens: * Top becomes \section ** Second becomes \subsection *** Third becomes \subsubsection Fourth becomes \enumerate Is there a way to

Re: [O] latex export for 4th-level heading

Aloha Ken, Ken Mankoff mank...@gmail.com writes: When exporting to LaTeX, fourth-level headings become \enumerate. In LaTeX, the item below \subsubsection is \paragraph, not \enumerate. Here is what happens: * Top becomes \section ** Second becomes \subsection *** Third becomes

Re: [O] latex export for 4th-level heading

* On 2014-07-10 at 17:08, Thomas S. Dye wrote: Aloha Ken, Ken Mankoff mank...@gmail.com writes: When exporting to LaTeX, fourth-level headings become \enumerate. In LaTeX, the item below \subsubsection is \paragraph, not \enumerate. Here is what happens: * Top becomes \section **

Re: [O] latex export for 4th-level heading

Ken Mankoff mank...@gmail.com writes: * On 2014-07-10 at 17:08, Thomas S. Dye wrote: Aloha Ken, Ken Mankoff mank...@gmail.com writes: When exporting to LaTeX, fourth-level headings become \enumerate. In LaTeX, the item below \subsubsection is \paragraph, not \enumerate. Here is what

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Thanks for the kind words, Martin. I hope you stay inspired since making a few homemade paperbacks sounds like something I'd like to try. Cheers, Alan On 31 May 2014 17:25, Martin Schöön martin.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 May 2014 06:31, Alan Tyree typh...@aanet.com.au wrote: Hi Steven,

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

On 28 May 2014 06:31, Alan Tyree typh...@aanet.com.au wrote: Hi Steven, You want to learn more about LaTeX, but it's not too much. I wrote a little book called Self-publishing with LyX that will help you set up the title page as well as some of your other problems. This is not a sales pitch

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Hi Alan, I downloaded the book and went through it--thank you for putting that together! It was a valuable overview. Nonetheless, some confusions persist for me since I'm using emacs org-mode and not LyX. Should I be putting LaTeX markup into my org-mode doc, for instance, for formatting the

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Am 28.05.2014 um 08:07 schrieb Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com: Hi Alan, I downloaded the book and went through it--thank you for putting that together! It was a valuable overview. Nonetheless, some confusions persist for me since I'm using emacs org-mode and not LyX. Should I be

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

On 2014-05-27 23:25, Steven Arntson wrote: Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes: Igor Sosa Mayor joseleopoldo1...@gmail.com writes: Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com writes: Hi, I'm trying to export an org-mode doc to LaTex and subsequently to PDF. This is a literary novel, written in

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Hi Steven, Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com writes: Hi, I'm trying to export an org-mode doc to LaTex and subsequently to PDF. This is a literary novel, written in prose. Right now when I run the export command, the resulting file is incorrectly formatted for the literary world, and

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

What kind of deadlines are you facing to accomplish this? Grant Rettke | AAAS, ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM, Sigma Xi g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Rick, Your google search to find the sffms style package seems like it could be the perfect answer to my quandary. I'm trying now to get my head around acquiring it. I don't have a great track record with installing things, and try to use package management systems when I can. Sffms is located

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com writes: Rick, Your google search to find the sffms style package seems like it could be the perfect answer to my quandary. I'm trying now to get my head around acquiring it. I don't have a great track record with installing things, and try to use

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes: Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com writes: Rick, Your google search to find the sffms style package seems like it could be the perfect answer to my quandary. I'm trying now to get my head around acquiring it. I don't have a great track record with

Re: [O] LaTex export questions

Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com writes: Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes: Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com writes: Rick, Your google search to find the sffms style package seems like it could be the perfect answer to my quandary. I'm trying now to get my head around

  1   2   3   4   5   >