Re: [O] Some struggles of mine with org-mode
Eric Schulte eric.schu...@gmx.com writes: - Email. Some very elegant (in complicated ways) solutions have been generated, but all I need it simple text-based email. I would be willing to install sendmail or postfix, if need be, but I don't really wish to send html based email. See the next item. Limiting to the one aspect of this email towards which I may have something useful to contribute. One option for text email is to use org-mime from contrib/lisp/org-mime.el and then structure a subtree as follows... , | * send this to eric | :PROPERTIES: | :mail_to: eric.schu...@foo.bar | :END: | | Here is an Org-mode email which will be sent to me. | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | ` calling org-mime-subtree from within that subtree will result in a message buffer holding the following (modulo your gnus/message setup) , | To: eric.schu...@foo.bar | Subject: send this to eric | X-Draft-From: (org-mode 2692) | From: Eric Schulte eric.schu...@foo.bar | --text follows this line-- | Here is an Org-mode email which will be sent to me. | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | ` By default the resulting email is text generated using (I believe) org-export-as-org. [...] One thing I really like about Org-mode is the ability to keep a large number of kinds of information straight in various ways---either in separate files, or for related topics, in different headlines of the same file. I need all of these files to be searched. The best searching seems to reside in the agenda interface. But it seems illogical, to me, to constrain searching to the same set of files as for an Agenda, except if I am only searching things I am currently keeping on todo lists. I want a large subset of *.org files open for searches, but I may want to limit the number of files processed for a daily or weekly agenda view. The desire to separate searching from agenda views makes perfect sense to me. I've never used the searching features of Org-mode myself. I suppose I use rgrep when digging through my Org-mode ~/notes/recipes. Cheers, On the subject I too tried org-contacts and found it novel but not really a replacement for bbdb. I tried gnus sync with google contacts too but that was too slow. I suspect the best way to handle this is to simply use a google to bbdb importer and continue to use bbdb for contact lookups as its nicely integrated already (well, in gnus it is) and seems fast enough.
Re: [O] Some struggles of mine with org-mode
At Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:16:02 -0800, lngn...@gmail.com wrote: So, to summarize, org-agenda-files should reflect those files I need to access because they have TODOs, Deadlines, Happenings, or Reminders in them. My search Universe should be constrained enough to result in instant searches, but not so constrained as org-agenda-files that need to be processed to produce a daily agenda. Are you using `org-agenda-custom-commands' variable? You can specify different sets of agenda files for different commands. There is an `org-agenda-text-search-extra-files' variable, which when bound, adds to the existing agenda files, and has a special value 'agenda-archives, which means all the .org_archive files with same name as agenda files. So assuming you have your regular org-agenda-files set to your minimum universe, you can define extra searches like so: (setq org-agenda-custom-commands '((/ Occur with archives ((search ((org-agenda-text-search-extra-files '(agenda-archives)) (k Occur with archives + knowledge base ((search ((org-agenda-files (cons ~/kb/ org-agenda-files)) (org-agenda-text-search-extra-files '(agenda-archives)) )) This will make C-c a / search your normal agenda files, plus their archives, and C-c a k will in addition search all org files and their archives in ~/kb/ directory.
Re: [O] Some struggles of mine with org-mode
lngn...@gmail.com writes: [This post concerns what have become, for me, conflicts between the scopes of org-agenda-files and the universe I would like to search within all org files, in particular. I hope I will be forgiven for drifting substantially from that focused topic] Org-mode is well entrenched into my daily work flow, in many ways. - Miscellaneous notes - Capturing ideas and articles - On-the-fly structured captures of several kinds - Todo lists - Remembering deadlines and activities - Collecting project information from diverse sources - Exporting any of the above, just about anything at all, as clean PDF files. - The occasional Beamer presentation For all that org-mode has become my go-to tool of choice, there are a number of things I still struggle with. I want to post this message as, I suppose, too much of a blanket request. Here are some of the things I don't get: - Firefox or other browser integration What kind of integration are you looking for. For some versions of Firefox, it is possible to link to org-capture. - Email. Some very elegant (in complicated ways) solutions have been generated, but all I need it simple text-based email. I would be willing to install sendmail or postfix, if need be, but I don't really wish to send html based email. See the next item. Again, what exactly are you looking for? You can turn on orgstruct-mode and orgstruct++-mode in one of the mail hooks (mail-setup-hook or message-setup-hook). e.g. I have (add-hook 'message-setup-hook 'turn-on-orgstruct++) in my gnus configuration file. This adds very useful list and table functionality to the standard message composition mode. - Addresses/Contacts. I like Gnus, and I like BBDB, but I've never been completely comfortable with them. I used to keep contacts in EDB, a database I designed myself, and it worked really, really well. I've posted about his subject before, and I can see it didn't strike a chord on this list. I tried org-contacts, but it seems idiosyncratic, and limited. I do sympathise. I use bbdb and have learned to live with it but I definitely don't /love/ it, probably because I use only a small subset of its capabilities. Mind you, bbdb has been going through a complete rewrite for version 3, I believe, so the user experience may be improved there. I haven't tried that yet. I also haven't tried org-contacts, mostly because my gnus+bbdb configuration works well enough for me so I don't feel the pressure to change. - Setting up birthday alerts, for example. I feel intimidated every time I am about to try to put a new birthday in a list. Ideally, I would do this with a capture template. The best so far is to keep birthdays in a list in .emacs.el You can get birthday alerts with bbdb integrated with org although again this requires using bbdb! Check out ,[ C-h v org-bbdb-anniversary-format-alist RET ] | org-bbdb-anniversary-format-alist is a variable defined in `org-bbdb.el'. | Its value is shown below. | | Documentation: | How different types of anniversaries should be formatted. | [...] ` - Searching. One thing I really like about Org-mode is the ability to keep a large number of kinds of information straight in various ways---either in separate files, or for related topics, in different headlines of the same file. I need all of these files to be searched. The best searching seems to reside in the agenda interface. But it seems illogical, to [...] So, to summarize, org-agenda-files should reflect those files I need to access because they have TODOs, Deadlines, Happenings, or Reminders in them. My search Universe should be constrained enough to result in instant searches, but not so constrained as org-agenda-files that need to be processed to produce a daily agenda. I agree with you here. It would be nice to have an alternative search procedure that is not limited to agenda files. Because of this, I have my general catch-all notes.org file as one of the entries in org-agenda-files. IMO, it doesn't belong there as I have separate tasks.org and diary.org files for agenda related items. However, note that you *can* use the searching capabilities in individual files. Not what you want but very useful nonetheless. HTH, eric -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.92.1 : using Org-mode version 7.8.03 (release_7.8.03.325.g5847)
[O] Some struggles of mine with org-mode
[This post concerns what have become, for me, conflicts between the scopes of org-agenda-files and the universe I would like to search within all org files, in particular. I hope I will be forgiven for drifting substantially from that focused topic] Org-mode is well entrenched into my daily work flow, in many ways. - Miscellaneous notes - Capturing ideas and articles - On-the-fly structured captures of several kinds - Todo lists - Remembering deadlines and activities - Collecting project information from diverse sources - Exporting any of the above, just about anything at all, as clean PDF files. - The occasional Beamer presentation For all that org-mode has become my go-to tool of choice, there are a number of things I still struggle with. I want to post this message as, I suppose, too much of a blanket request. Here are some of the things I don't get: - Firefox or other browser integration - Email. Some very elegant (in complicated ways) solutions have been generated, but all I need it simple text-based email. I would be willing to install sendmail or postfix, if need be, but I don't really wish to send html based email. See the next item. - Addresses/Contacts. I like Gnus, and I like BBDB, but I've never been completely comfortable with them. I used to keep contacts in EDB, a database I designed myself, and it worked really, really well. I've posted about his subject before, and I can see it didn't strike a chord on this list. I tried org-contacts, but it seems idiosyncratic, and limited. - Setting up birthday alerts, for example. I feel intimidated every time I am about to try to put a new birthday in a list. Ideally, I would do this with a capture template. The best so far is to keep birthdays in a list in .emacs.el - Searching. One thing I really like about Org-mode is the ability to keep a large number of kinds of information straight in various ways---either in separate files, or for related topics, in different headlines of the same file. I need all of these files to be searched. The best searching seems to reside in the agenda interface. But it seems illogical, to me, to constrain searching to the same set of files as for an Agenda, except if I am only searching things I am currently keeping on todo lists. I want a large subset of *.org files open for searches, but I may want to limit the number of files processed for a daily or weekly agenda view. Am I missing something? A utility on the mailing list, org-occur-goto, searches any open files, an improvement. But the very fact I am searching for something suggests this will require a greater search universe. Ideally, that universe will include several large subtrees, even though within them, only a small number of files may be involved. For example, one would like to have a directory, at some random location in the home ~/ tree, for recipes. I want them to be kept together in an integral tree. But I want some of the files to be kept under org-mode control. Do I want these files in my agenda files? I do not wish to have all of my action dumped together in ~/org or some such. Examples subdirectories might include: - ~/HEALTH-ISSUES/ - ~/ARTICLES/tuning-the-guitar/ - ~/PROJECTS/recipes/ I have a large ~/WorkBench directory that includes all ongoing work. I may not know on any given day which existing projects I will be working on. I like to scatter my TODOs among the project files, but I need to maintain instantaneous access to them, especially through the agenda views. So, to summarize, org-agenda-files should reflect those files I need to access because they have TODOs, Deadlines, Happenings, or Reminders in them. My search Universe should be constrained enough to result in instant searches, but not so constrained as org-agenda-files that need to be processed to produce a daily agenda.
Re: [O] Some struggles of mine with org-mode
- Email. Some very elegant (in complicated ways) solutions have been generated, but all I need it simple text-based email. I would be willing to install sendmail or postfix, if need be, but I don't really wish to send html based email. See the next item. Limiting to the one aspect of this email towards which I may have something useful to contribute. One option for text email is to use org-mime from contrib/lisp/org-mime.el and then structure a subtree as follows... , | * send this to eric | :PROPERTIES: | :mail_to: eric.schu...@foo.bar | :END: | | Here is an Org-mode email which will be sent to me. | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | ` calling org-mime-subtree from within that subtree will result in a message buffer holding the following (modulo your gnus/message setup) , | To: eric.schu...@foo.bar | Subject: send this to eric | X-Draft-From: (org-mode 2692) | From: Eric Schulte eric.schu...@foo.bar | --text follows this line-- | Here is an Org-mode email which will be sent to me. | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | ` By default the resulting email is text generated using (I believe) org-export-as-org. [...] One thing I really like about Org-mode is the ability to keep a large number of kinds of information straight in various ways---either in separate files, or for related topics, in different headlines of the same file. I need all of these files to be searched. The best searching seems to reside in the agenda interface. But it seems illogical, to me, to constrain searching to the same set of files as for an Agenda, except if I am only searching things I am currently keeping on todo lists. I want a large subset of *.org files open for searches, but I may want to limit the number of files processed for a daily or weekly agenda view. The desire to separate searching from agenda views makes perfect sense to me. I've never used the searching features of Org-mode myself. I suppose I use rgrep when digging through my Org-mode ~/notes/recipes. Cheers, -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/
