Hi Adam,
Adam Porter writes:
> I mostly agree with you. My request is simply that, when a change
> has the potential to break third-party packages, and it's a change,
> such as this one, that mostly moves code around for organizational
> purposes, that it be delayed until the next major
Hi Bastien,
On 6/1/20, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Porter writes:
>
>> The relatively recent moving of org-get-outline-path to org-refile.el
>> has caused breakage in Org itself in several places, e.g.
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2020-04/msg00260.html
>>
Hi Adam,
Adam Porter writes:
> The relatively recent moving of org-get-outline-path to org-refile.el
> has caused breakage in Org itself in several places, e.g.
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2020-04/msg00260.html
>
Hello,
Adam Porter writes:
> Of course, I am biased here, but I feel like it's not quite as
> exceptional as it ought to be. The more Org-related packages I make and
> maintain, the more version-specific workarounds I have to add due to
> changed function names, signatures, etc. These are
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Adam Porter writes:
>
>> The relatively recent moving of org-get-outline-path to org-refile.el
>> has caused breakage in Org itself in several places, e.g.
>
> [...]
>
>> Thankfully, Kyle has proposed a patch to revert that change. I hope
>> it
Hello,
Adam Porter writes:
> The relatively recent moving of org-get-outline-path to org-refile.el
> has caused breakage in Org itself in several places, e.g.
[...]
> Thankfully, Kyle has proposed a patch to revert that change. I hope it
> is merged.
>
> If it is not, when a new Org version
The relatively recent moving of org-get-outline-path to org-refile.el
has caused breakage in Org itself in several places, e.g.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2020-04/msg00260.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2020-04/msg00259.html
