Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Eric S Fraga writes: > On Sunday, 6 Mar 2016 at 20:26, Samuel Loury wrote: >> Samuel Loury writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> I will clean the *elc files and send another report. I will also >>> deactivate the advises not to pollute the results. >> >> Actually,

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On Sunday, 6 Mar 2016 at 20:26, Samuel Loury wrote: > Samuel Loury writes: > > [...] > >> I will clean the *elc files and send another report. I will also >> deactivate the advises not to pollute the results. > > Actually, profiler reports don't look really easy to read. I

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Eric S Fraga writes: > On Monday, 22 Feb 2016 at 10:04, Samuel Loury wrote: > > [...] > >> Reproducing a slow behavior is not easy. Today, the agenda is produced >> in about 10s with almost the same contents. I included the profiler >> report anyway, hoping that you will find

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On Monday, 22 Feb 2016 at 10:04, Samuel Loury wrote: [...] > Reproducing a slow behavior is not easy. Today, the agenda is produced > in about 10s with almost the same contents. I included the profiler > report anyway, hoping that you will find something useful in it. > > - command-execute

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Samuel Loury writes: > >> I have made a custom agenda command¹ to implement a "kind of" GTD >> workflow. >> >> On a quite old computer with no SSD disk, the commands takes about 20 >> seconds. My org files sum up to

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Hello, Samuel Loury writes: > I have made a custom agenda command¹ to implement a "kind of" GTD > workflow. > > On a quite old computer with no SSD disk, the commands takes about 20 > seconds. My org files sum up to 27K lines and 2629 headings (with the > archives, there

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Samuel Loury writes: > >> Nevertheless, org-mode is rather slow when my todo.org file becomes >> quite large (~20K lines). > > Could you share some profiler information under typical usage so that we > can tell which

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On Tuesday, 16 Feb 2016 at 17:44, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Samuel Loury writes: > >> Nevertheless, org-mode is rather slow when my todo.org file becomes >> quite large (~20K lines). > > Could you share some profiler information under typical usage so that we > can

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Hello, Samuel Loury writes: > Nevertheless, org-mode is rather slow when my todo.org file becomes > quite large (~20K lines). Could you share some profiler information under typical usage so that we can tell which parts are slow? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On Tuesday, 16 Feb 2016 at 15:14, Samuel Loury wrote: [...] > I still like a lot the liberty of the "plain text approach" of > org-mode. It is VERY powerful, but it becomes a real problem when > needing to use that power without emacs. Yes, org works well because of the plain-text approach but

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

luke call writes: > On 02/02/16 00:23, Robert Klein wrote: [...] >> As your 'product' is >> not relevant to org-mode [] > > I mentioned OM here only because I thought it of interest to > org-mode users, which it evidently was to at least two who thanked me, > and I

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On Mon, 01-02-2016, at 22:25, luke call wrote: > On 01/31/16 08:37, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: > > Thanks for the link. Good-faith question here: does it support spaced > > repetition such as provided by org-drill > > (http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-drill.html)

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On 2016-02-01, at 23:15, luke call wrote: > I originally reported here because I thought there could be interest to > this community, but out of respect I wonder if further conversation > should move to the onemodel.org list(s), unless the culture here allows > going

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On 02/03/16 02:33, Marcin Borkowski wrote: I, for one, would definitely like an occasional update (say, once a month or two) about the progress on this project. Even if I do not want to leave Org, I might want to suggest OM to a friend, for instance. And I definitely do not want to subscribe

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:15:03 -0700 luke call wrote: > I'm not org-mode power-user but what I recall from my use years ago > is that I moved away because of the # of keystrokes to do operations, > having to open different files for different topics, and that one > single

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On 02/03/16 10:15, Bingo UV wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:15:03 -0700 luke call wrote: I'm not org-mode power-user but what I recall from my use years ago is that I moved away because of the # of keystrokes to do operations, having to open different files for different

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Hi Luke, thanks for the very comprehensive answer. I can now see where you are heading. And it's a laudable direction. But not for me because of one fundamental property of org: "it's all text". I've been in this business a very *long* time and, if I've learnt anything at all, it's that

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On 02/02/16 00:23, Robert Klein wrote: > So I have to actually pay for export (C-c C-e in org-mode and more > formats to export to), searching (C-s and C-r in emacs, > probably more in org-mode) and /maybe/ recent bugfixes? And probably > no Emacs shortcut keys. All features are in the

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On 01/31/16 08:37, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: > Thanks for the link. Good-faith question here: does it support spaced > repetition such as provided by org-drill > (http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-drill.html) or Anki > (http://ankisrs.net/), for memorizing some of the stored knowledge? I >

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On 01/31/16 05:32, Eric S Fraga wrote: > I'll bite: so what does onemodel solve that org does not do? Serious > question as I have gone through the web site and I cannot see the USP of > this system. Also a really good question. I'll state it as compared to what I remember of org-mode, but

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

Hi, luke call wrote: > There's a program that org-mode users (as I have been) specifically > might be interested in, a personal "knowledge manager"/list > manager/organizer/etc called OneModel (Free/AGPL). Instead of > storing data as text, it puts *everything* in a

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

I'll bite: so what does onemodel solve that org does not do? Serious question as I have gone through the web site and I cannot see the USP of this system. Thanks, eric -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3.3-497-gc74b99

Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool

On Fri, 29-01-2016, at 19:21, luke call wrote: > There's a program that org-mode users (as I have been) specifically > might be interested in, a personal "knowledge manager"/list > manager/organizer/etc called OneModel (Free/AGPL). Instead of storing > data as text,