Hi,
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org writes:
The problem with that is that a displayed equation should NOT start a
new paragraph (in the generated LaTeX file). This is because if it
does then LaTeX puts more (vertical) space than desirable.
If this is always the case for you, you can fix this
5. Existing documents are very easy to fix.
Backwards compatibility is important. It has been broken
before, for very good reasons, and even though it was done very
carefully, it still caused many problems (still does).
So I don't buy the very easy to fix part: it will bite somebody
two minutes
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org writes:
5. Existing documents are very easy to fix.
Backwards compatibility is important. It has been broken
before, for very good reasons, and even though it was done very
carefully, it still caused many problems (still does).
So I don't buy the very easy to fix
It's a bit more complicated than that: one upgrades org at some
opportune moment, then three months/years/centuries later, tries to use
that presentation that worked perfectly before - boom. If you go back
and check all your old presentations each time you upgrade org, you are,
I would guess,
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org writes:
It's a bit more complicated than that: one upgrades org at some
opportune moment, then three months/years/centuries later, tries to use
that presentation that worked perfectly before - boom. If you go back
and check all your old presentations each time
Hello,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
It works sensibly in latex-mode. If your text is
My displayed \[equation\]
is here
M-q will make it
My displayed \[equation\] is here
But
My displayed
\[equation\]
is here
Is unaltered by M-q (though it was not obvious to
I didn't read the other thread is details, but it seems the most
sensible thing to do is alter the org fill function(s). These seems
to rely on org-element, though, and I'm guessing that is why a syntax
change is necessary, yes?
I would be perfectly happy with this behavior. Can't comment on
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org writes:
Who is entitled to vote? If I am then here is my vote in favor for the
following reasons:
1. the construct \[...\] has been defined in LaTeX for equations which
must stand out and therefore belong on separate lines. It would
therefore make sense to
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org writes:
Who is entitled to vote? If I am then here is my vote in favor for the
following reasons:
1. the construct \[...\] has been defined in LaTeX for equations which
must stand out and therefore belong on separate lines. It would
therefore make sense to
So what exactly is the problem?
The problem is that \[...\] is often used for long/complicated
equations. If you allow auto-fill to change/modify your carefully
written equation, it becomes very difficult to read.
Regards,
Fede
You wrote:
Hello,
As discussed in a recent thread[fn:1], \[...\] constructs are
counter-intuitive to some users.
At the time being, \[...\] are inline-able. As a consequence, they are
can be written in the middle of a line, and filled, much like \(...\).
Even though it is also possible to
11 matches
Mail list logo
