Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

(or attach-dir-inherited dir))) #+end_src Regards, Ihor Gustav Wikström writes: > Hi Ihor, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ihor Radchenko >> Sent: den 27 juli 2019 16:56 >> To: Gustav Wikström ; Nicolas Goaziou >> >> Cc: e

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hi Ihor, > -Original Message- > From: Ihor Radchenko > Sent: den 27 juli 2019 16:56 > To: Gustav Wikström ; Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options > I just found that removing ATTACH

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hi, > ATTACH_DIR_INHERIT is no longer supported and is +removed. I just found that removing ATTACH_DIR_INHERIT broke my current configuration. I do not use ATTACH_DIR property - all the attachment folders are created using ID. Also, I use ID property to store links to entries. Therefore,

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hello, Gustav Wikström writes: > Final patches attached for full disclosure before applying them. I see you applied your patches. Thank you. Just some remarks: - "Capture, Attachments, RSS Feeds and Protocols" is too long: we ought to find a shorter title, - Sub-nodes behind "Attachments"

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hi Gustav and all, Thanks for the refreshment of the org attach universe. In particular I like the new attachment type for links. I'd like to express my favorability to use the name "att" opposed to "attachment" to specify that type. Thanks for reading, best regards, Marco

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hello, Gustav Wikström writes: > + (if should-get > + (progn (message "Running git annex get \"%s\"." path-relative) > +(call-process "git" nil nil nil "annex" "get" path-relative)) > + (error "File %s stored in git annex but it is not available, and was > not

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hi Gustav, thanks a lot for your contribution! Please register as a user on https://code.orgmode.org then send me your username in a private email, I'll then add you to the list of people with push access. Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hello, Gustav Wikström writes: > Some updates, and a fresh patch...! Thank you. > > I won't say that much here since the patch speaks for itself (It > contains a chapter to be added to ORG-NEWS). It's patch 0002 that is the > important one. See sidenote below for a comment about patch 0001.

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hi again, Some updates, and a fresh patch...! I won't say that much here since the patch speaks for itself (It contains a chapter to be added to ORG-NEWS). It's patch 0002 that is the important one. See sidenote below for a comment about patch 0001. I have to mention that the patch has grown

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hello, Gustav Wikström writes: > Too bad, "@" was growing on me. @ is currently automatically set as > a tag when attaching files to nodes. You probably customized `org-attach-auto-tag' because this is not the default behaviour. It adds "ATTACH" tag automatically. > So it was fitting to use

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hi again, > -Original Message- > From: Nicolas Goaziou > Sent: den 20 november 2018 00:52 > To: Gustav Wikström > Cc: Org Mode List > Subject: Re: [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options > > > Yeah - I liked "attached" because I prefer clear keywords. But sure, > > we can

Re: [O] [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

Hello, Gustav Wikström writes: > Yeah - I liked "attached" because I prefer clear keywords. But sure, > we can keep it shorter. I'd suggest "@" instead in that case. Patch > updated with that. "@" syntax is a reserved syntax for citations in the "wip-cite" branch. I'd rather not use it here.