Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]

2013-05-22 Thread Rasmus
Viktor Rosenfeld listuse...@gmail.com writes: Ah, you mean the textsc? Perhaps it is a bit eccentric. But you're bringing up a good point. It should recognize [p]+s and perhaps even order them. . . If there is no PS prefix set, users could simply write these out themselves. I don't think

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]

2013-05-22 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi, Rasmus wrote: Viktor Rosenfeld listuse...@gmail.com writes: Ah, you mean the textsc? Perhaps it is a bit eccentric. But you're bringing up a good point. It should recognize [p]+s and perhaps even order them. . . If there is no PS prefix set, users could simply write these out

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]

2013-05-21 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi, Rasmus wrote: This is probably the most fun change. It adds special tags PS, ENCL, CC, AFTER_CLOSING as in my last patch set, but it uses heading this time. E.g. ENCLs are under the heading * ENCL :ENCL:. This was suggested by Nicolas, and it's nicer. The ideas comes from

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]

2013-05-21 Thread Rasmus
Viktor, Good to hear from you! This is probably the most fun change. It adds special tags PS, ENCL, CC, AFTER_CLOSING as in my last patch set, but it uses heading this time. E.g. ENCLs are under the heading * ENCL :ENCL:. This was suggested by Nicolas, and it's nicer. The ideas comes

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]

2013-05-21 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi, Rasmus wrote: - It doesn't work because `org-koma-letter-special-content' is set to nil at the beginning of `org-koma-letter-template'. Why is that? If I comment it out everything works. Hmm, it should be populated by the headline function each time. . . That is at least the

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]

2013-05-20 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello again, Rasmus writes: This is probably the most fun change. It adds special tags PS, ENCL, CC, AFTER_CLOSING as in my last patch set, but it uses heading this time. E.g. ENCLs are under the heading * ENCL :ENCL:. This was suggested by Nicolas, and it's nicer. The ideas comes from