Rasmus writes:
I found a bug in that the subject variable should be a list cf. the
KOMA manual. This patch fixes this.
It's pretty complex for something so simple, and I might be inclined
to admit to the put it in a LCO-file approach might be better.
I'd really like to have a second
Hi,
Alan Schmitt wrote:
Rasmus writes:
I found a bug in that the subject variable should be a list cf. the
KOMA manual. This patch fixes this.
It's pretty complex for something so simple, and I might be inclined
to admit to the put it in a LCO-file approach might be better.
I'd
Viktor Rosenfeld listuse...@gmail.com writes:
I found a bug in that the subject variable should be a list
cf. the
KOMA manual. This patch fixes this.
It's pretty complex for something so simple, and I might be
inclined
to admit to the put it in a LCO-file approach might be better.
Hello Rasmus,
Rasmus writes:
This could be a problematic change. It changes the way :with-subject
works. I've added changes to allow the subject style to be choose as
a radio list with customize. The reason is that LaTeX becomes unhappy
if it is not a supported value. If #+OPTIONS
This could be a problematic change. It changes the way :with-subject
works. I've added changes to allow the subject style to be choose as
a radio list with customize. The reason is that LaTeX becomes unhappy
if it is not a supported value. If #+OPTIONS subject:t the default is
used. If
