Hello Bastien,
I can't get this to work.
(org-clock-display '(16)) -- this works fine!
(let ((org-clock-display-default-range 'thisweek))
(org-clock-display))
^ This however just runs org-clock-display for all time without a prompt.
I have updated to HEAD and ran `make`.
On 28 July 2014
Hi Noah,
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Can I pass in the range when calling it from a function?
Not directly.
(org-clock-display '(16)) will interactively prompt for a range.
(let ((org-clock-display-default-range 'thisweek))
(org-clock-display))
will display the clock with the
I'm getting an error on HEAD now:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function org-add-props)
(org-add-props WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could be found from
where org.el is loaded. nil (quote face) (quote org-warning))
(message (org-add-props WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could be
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
I'm getting an error on HEAD now:
Please run `make' or `make autoloads'.
See http://orgmode.org/manual/Installation.html
--
Bastien
Works! Thanks!
Can I pass in the range when calling it from a function?
At the moment, I'm calling org-clock-display from a wrapper function that
does some other things. It would be cool to configure a default range when
calling it in that function.
On 31 May 2014 16:48, Bastien b...@gnu.org
Hi Noah,
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
That's pretty cool. Any reason it doesn't use the same syntax as the
:tstart param though?
I first want to see if the new feature is useful before adding up more
subfeatures. So let's wait until 8.3 is released and see if (more)
people want
Aha! Sorry, I hadn't updated my checkout to HEAD.
I see that when I run that command now, I get a prompt asking me for
Range with the following options:
lastmonth lastweek lastyear thismonth
thisweek thisyear today yesterday
And the new doc:
With one universal prefix argument, show the total
On 25 May 2014 07:26, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi Noah,
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
As for the rest, please try C-u C-u C-c C-x C-d from master.
We can enhance it by having an option setting the default custom
range for such display, but going further would
Hi Noah,
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
How do I configure the filtering?
What filtering?
Please re-read the whole thread (where I mention that we *could* have
an option for the default filtering option). Also put more context in
your questions -- such terse sentences makes me feel
On 20 April 2014 15:18, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Note: sorting the clock table doesn't work very well. I want each
level to be sorted recursively.
Yeah, me too -- if you can work on enhancing how the :sort parameters
is handled for clocktables,
Hi Noah,
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
As for the rest, please try C-u C-u C-c C-x C-d from master.
We can enhance it by having an option setting the default custom
range for such display, but going further would be too much.
What does this do? (What changed?)
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
What do others think about this idea?
I welcome feedback on this but let's take care not to overengineer
this: if we add to many features to `org-clock-display', it will blur
the line between this temporary display and clock tables.
I would first try
I suppose, in a way, blurring the line between org-clock-display and
clocktables is what I am trying to do. I think org-clock-display is much
more useful and easier to use. (Though I don't doubt that clocktables work
better for some folks.)
I started out with clocktables, but I found it clumsy to
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Note: sorting the clock table doesn't work very well. I want each
level to be sorted recursively.
Yeah, me too -- if you can work on enhancing how the :sort parameters
is handled for clocktables, that'd be great.
As for the rest, please try C-u C-u C-c
14 matches
Mail list logo
