Hi,
On 2014-04-28 19:18, Rene jl...@yahoo.com writes:
I'm not used to defining new properties in orgmode. I'll try to define an
Energy property as well as functions like org-agenda-cmp-user-defined in
order to correctly use org-agenda-sorting-strategy, unless someone has
already done so...
Hi,
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:
On 2014-04-28 19:18, Rene jl...@yahoo.com writes:
I have not defined an Energy property, but I recently played with date
properties (and a user defined sorting function). If it's helpful to
you, the code is there:
Hi Samuel,
On 2014-04-29 12:30, Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:
On 2014-04-28 19:18, Rene jl...@yahoo.com writes:
I have not defined an Energy property, but I recently played with date
properties (and a user defined sorting
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:
On 2014-04-29 12:30, Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com writes:
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:
On 2014-04-28 19:18, Rene jl...@yahoo.com writes:
I have not defined an Energy property, but I recently played with date
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com writes:
In that case, OBJECT is not the current buffer but a string called
'a'. Thus, IIUC, it makes no sense to use OBJECT=a and
POSITION=(point-min).
Indeed. It should be 0 in this case, thanks for spotting this,
--
Bastien
On 2014-04-29 15:31, Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com writes:
In that case, OBJECT is not the current buffer but a string called
'a'. Thus, IIUC, it makes no sense to use OBJECT=a and
POSITION=(point-min).
Indeed. It should be 0 in this case,
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:
Thanks a lot indeed. I'll fix this. I have no idea why it worked in my
case ...
It half-worked: in this case (point-min) value was 1, taken from the
buffer, but you really want to set POSITION at 0 -- try point-max and
you'll see it raises an
Richard Lawrence richard.lawrence at berkeley.edu writes:
I am not really familiar with the official GTD methodology, and I don't
know exactly how you would normally represent the energy needed
associated with a task, but here's a suggestion.
It occurs to me that you could just use the A/B/C
Hi Rene,
Rene jl...@yahoo.com writes:
According to David Allen, whenever you define an action you need to
assign three pieces of information that you will later use as criteria
to decide what to do (in order of precedence):
1. Context: Where should I be (@home, @work, etc.) and/or which
