Re: [O] Multi-line macros (again)

2016-10-12 Thread Rasmus
Hi, >> To me, the syntax is a bit tiresome for inline calls, >> >> call_[]()[> arguments>] > > This is where macros can shine. You can define a macro expanding to this > template. Sure. >> I wonder if we could allow remote editing of macros like with table >> formulas. > > This is

Re: [O] Multi-line macros (again)

2016-10-12 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > To me, the syntax is a bit tiresome for inline calls, > > call_[]()[ arguments>] This is where macros can shine. You can define a macro expanding to this template. > I wonder if we could allow remote editing of macros like with table > formulas.

Re: [O] Multi-line macros (again)

2016-10-12 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Jarmo Hurri writes: > >> One of the most useful properties of LaTeX is \newcommand, which allows >> you to reuse document structures. I really, _really_ miss this feature >> in Org. Org has #+MACRO, but it is

Re: [O] Multi-line macros (again)

2016-10-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Jarmo Hurri writes: > One of the most useful properties of LaTeX is \newcommand, which allows > you to reuse document structures. I really, _really_ miss this feature > in Org. Org has #+MACRO, but it is limited to a single line. That is > very inconvenient for any