Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Bastien writes:
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually
reached?
That would be too complicated. Checking that `org-open-at-point'
does not throw an error is enough IMO.
I don't
Bastien writes:
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually
reached?
That would be too complicated. Checking that `org-open-at-point'
does not throw an error is enough IMO.
I don't think so. Implemented a check for that in 8e72c8fcfa.
Hi York,
York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes:
Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think
it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
Yes.
For your convenience, I've attached again in this message the same patch I had
sent on
York Zhao writes:
Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think
it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually reached?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
York Zhao writes:
Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you
think
it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually
reached?
That would be
Hi Bastien,
Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think
it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
For your convenience, I've attached again in this message the same patch I had
sent on April 10.
Thanks,
York
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at
Hi Bastien,
On 2014-04-17, Bastien wrote:
The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to
implement. But maybe other users have existing use-cases
Hi Bastien,
I apologize that I missed your reply, I discovered it until now when I was
checking the replies in the Sent folder.
The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
To me, raw link is hardly useful because
Hi York,
York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes:
* Peter
:PROPERTIES:
:ADDRESS: xxx xxx
:HOME_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx
:WORK_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx
:URL: www.foo.bar
:END:
The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket
Hi Bastien,
Sorry that I didn't know this was a known issue and I appreciate that you are
willing to fix it.
While I agree with Nicolas that it is more appropriate to keep org schedule line
from being a headline property, I also think it is totally legitimate to have an
org link as headline
Hello,
York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes:
I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a heading
property.
This is expected, as node properties cannot contain Org syntax. See
also
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/84300
Regards,
--
Nicolas
Hi York,
York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes:
I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a
heading property.
This is a known issue and we will address it soon.
This used to work and was broken recently. I have written a test for
this. The test is suppose to fail
12 matches
Mail list logo