Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi Achim, Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes: Bastien writes: Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes: Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually reached? That would be too complicated. Checking that `org-open-at-point' does not throw an error is enough IMO. I don't think so. Implemented a check for that in 8e72c8fcfa. Okay, thanks. I pushed a small update, separating tests where we test that `org-open-at-point' correctly opens the link at point, and tests where we only tests that it correctly runs in a specific context. -- Bastien
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Bastien writes: Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes: Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually reached? That would be too complicated. Checking that `org-open-at-point' does not throw an error is enough IMO. I don't think so. Implemented a check for that in 8e72c8fcfa. Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi York, York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes: Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this? Yes. For your convenience, I've attached again in this message the same patch I had sent on April 10. Installed, thanks, -- Bastien
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
York Zhao writes: Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this? Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually reached? Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ DIY Stuff: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/DIY.html
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes: York Zhao writes: Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this? Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually reached? That would be too complicated. Checking that `org-open-at-point' does not throw an error is enough IMO. -- Bastien
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi Bastien,
Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think
it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
For your convenience, I've attached again in this message the same patch I had
sent on April 10.
Thanks,
York
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:56 PM, York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bastien,
I apologize that I missed your reply, I discovered it until now when I was
checking the replies in the Sent folder.
The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
To me, raw link is hardly useful because too often the web link is really
long,
in which case the bracket link acts like a way of abstraction.
Thank you very much for considering this fix.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi York,
York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes:
* Peter
:PROPERTIES:
:ADDRESS: xxx xxx
:HOME_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx
:WORK_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx
:URL: www.foo.bar
:END:
The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to
implement. But maybe other users have existing use-cases for Org
links there, I don't know.
--
Bastien
From df0788134a16baa9762616637c0fe7f568e3e63e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:21:15 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] test-org-element: Add test for `org-open-at-point' with link
being heading property.
---
testing/lisp/test-org-element.el | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-org-element.el b/testing/lisp/test-org-element.el
index 576e3d3..8cfceac 100644
--- a/testing/lisp/test-org-element.el
+++ b/testing/lisp/test-org-element.el
@@ -1461,6 +1461,15 @@ e^{i\\pi}+1=0
(search-forward file:)
(org-element-property :type (org-element-context))
+(ert-deftest test-org-element/org-open-at-point ()
+ Test `org-open-at-point' with link being a heading property.
+ (org-test-with-temp-text
+ * Headline
+:PROPERTIES:
+:URL: point[[info:org#Top]]
+:END:
+(org-open-at-point)))
+
Macro
--
1.8.4
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi Bastien, On 2014-04-17, Bastien wrote: The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties, or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there? Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to implement. But maybe other users have existing use-cases for Org links there, I don't know. I have. I'm using phone links (see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/69406/focus=70484) in conjunction with org-contacts in the properties of my contacts. -- Michael Strey www.strey.biz
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi Bastien, I apologize that I missed your reply, I discovered it until now when I was checking the replies in the Sent folder. The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties, or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there? To me, raw link is hardly useful because too often the web link is really long, in which case the bracket link acts like a way of abstraction. Thank you very much for considering this fix. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: Hi York, York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes: * Peter :PROPERTIES: :ADDRESS: xxx xxx :HOME_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx :WORK_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx :URL: www.foo.bar :END: The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties, or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there? Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to implement. But maybe other users have existing use-cases for Org links there, I don't know. -- Bastien
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi York, York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes: * Peter :PROPERTIES: :ADDRESS: xxx xxx :HOME_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx :WORK_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx :URL: www.foo.bar :END: The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties, or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there? Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to implement. But maybe other users have existing use-cases for Org links there, I don't know. -- Bastien
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi Bastien, Sorry that I didn't know this was a known issue and I appreciate that you are willing to fix it. While I agree with Nicolas that it is more appropriate to keep org schedule line from being a headline property, I also think it is totally legitimate to have an org link as headline property. Sure we can always move org links out of headline properties, but I'm sure there are times we don't want to see some of the links all the time, we really want to hide them inside the property tree. For example, when we put a person's information as properties, like the following: * Peter :PROPERTIES: :ADDRESS: xxx xxx :HOME_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx :WORK_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx :URL: www.foo.bar :END: We hope we don't have to always move the link (the URL line in the properties tree) out, i.e., we don't want to see the link all the time. Let's add tests when they don't fail :) Fair enough, just make sure it will not be forgotten. Thanks On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: Hi York, York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes: I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a heading property. This is a known issue and we will address it soon. This used to work and was broken recently. I have written a test for this. The test is suppose to fail in current org-mode version. Please find attached my patch for the test. Hopefully I I didn't place the test in the wrong file. Let's add tests when they don't fail :) -- Bastien
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hello, York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes: I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a heading property. This is expected, as node properties cannot contain Org syntax. See also http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/84300 Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Patch for testing `org-open-at-point'
Hi York, York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes: I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a heading property. This is a known issue and we will address it soon. This used to work and was broken recently. I have written a test for this. The test is suppose to fail in current org-mode version. Please find attached my patch for the test. Hopefully I I didn't place the test in the wrong file. Let's add tests when they don't fail :) -- Bastien
