Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Hi François,

pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:

 I added Du  as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
 directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
 it a limitation (or a bug)?

I would call it a limitation.

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread François Pinard
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:

 Hi François,

Bonjour, Bastien!

 I added Du  as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
 directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
 it a limitation (or a bug)?

 I would call it a limitation.

Could it be documented somewhere appropriate?  Along with Nick's
suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem.

François



Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Bonjour François,

pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:

 Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:

 Hi François,

 Bonjour, Bastien!

 I added Du  as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
 directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
 it a limitation (or a bug)?

 I would call it a limitation.

 Could it be documented somewhere appropriate?  Along with Nick's
 suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem.

Yes, it could be documented in an appropriate place in Worg.

Please suggest one and send a patch!

Best,

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-03-05 Thread Nick Dokos
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:

 
 Given the following header contents:
 
 * Problème date
 - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
 - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
 
 here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing:
 
 
 I added Du  as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
 directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
 it a limitation (or a bug)?
 

[2012-02-29] looks like an inactive date, as well as the description of
a link.  I presume the ambiguity causes this problem, so you somehow
have to disambiguate it.  Prefixing it with Du (or just about anything,
including a space) is one way to do that.

So a limitation certainly - a bug? Maybe, maybe not.

Nick