Re: [O] Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords
Michael Alan Dormanwrites: > But that will actually end up in another column, won't it? It will. > As a bit of background: I have, historically, harvested the "Headline" > column for a weekly report, which depends on the state of the headline > being included---not including it there, even if it can be in a separate > column, dramatically decreases the utility of the clocktable for me > because it becomes a lot more work to produce that report. The TODO keyword would still be on the same line as the heading, only a few columns away from the location. Honestly, I don't see why it would be a lot more work to produce that report. If you don't succeed in updating your code, you may want to post it here so Org users can help you. Regards,
Re: [O] Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords
Thanks for your reply (and all the work you do on org), Nicolas. > This doesn't ring a bell. Anyway, the current behaviour sounds right, > since you can get TODO state with the "TODO" special property anyway. But that will actually end up in another column, won't it? As a bit of background: I have, historically, harvested the "Headline" column for a weekly report, which depends on the state of the headline being included---not including it there, even if it can be in a separate column, dramatically decreases the utility of the clocktable for me because it becomes a lot more work to produce that report. Of course maybe the answer is that I should just write the elisp to generate the report, but that's a big chunk of work, too. :() For the moment, I guess I'll just stick with 9.05 Mike.
Re: [O] Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords
Hello, Michael Alan Dormanwrites: > Given the following document: > > * TODO Thingy > ** TODO Sub-Thingy 1 >:LOGBOOK: >CLOCK: [2017-07-12 Wed 07:15]--[2017-07-12 Wed 07:25] => 0:10 >:END: > ** DONE Sub-Thingy 2 >:LOGBOOK: >CLOCK: [2017-07-12 Wed 07:25]--[2017-07-12 Wed 07:31] => 0:06 >:END: > > I would previously get a clocktable like (simulated): > > #+BEGIN: clocktable > #+CAPTION: Clock summary at [2017-07-12 Wed 07:32] > > | Headline | Time | | > |---++--| > | *Total time* | *0:16* | | > |---++--| > | TODO Thingy | 0:16 | | > | \_ TODO Sub-Thingy 1 || 0:10 | > | \_ DONE Sub-Thingy 2 || 0:06 | > #+END: > > Starting with (I believe) org 9.05, I get > > #+BEGIN: clocktable > #+CAPTION: Clock summary at [2017-07-12 Wed 07:32] > > | Headline | Time | | > |--++--| > | *Total time* | *0:16* | | > |--++--| > | Thingy | 0:16 | | > | \_ Sub-Thingy 1 || 0:10 | > | \_ Sub-Thingy 2 || 0:06 | > #+END: > > I don't see any note of this in ORG-NEWS, so I assume it's a > regression. I haven't had a chance to really dig into it yet. This doesn't ring a bell. Anyway, the current behaviour sounds right, since you can get TODO state with the "TODO" special property anyway. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou