Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

/s/indention/indentation/ And sorry for the earlier top-posting and generally awful formatting. For some odd reason I subscribed using Gmail, and that is giving me some grieve. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Jonas Bernoulli wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM,

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > > Could you show an ECM? > I was going to, but: Turns out: 1. Whether -i is used doesn't matter here. 2. The reason these blocks are not intended the same way is that SRC => @example or @lisp EXAMPLE =>

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Besides, using `org-export-filter-final-output-functions' seems easier > than your set up. > This approach works too. The following code produces exactly the same result as what I posted earlier: (defun

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

I'll get back to you in a few days. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Jonas Bernoulli writes: > > > I did notice myself that the two-space indentation for blocks that are > part > > of a list element are reserved and

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

Jonas Bernoulli writes: > I did notice myself that the two-space indentation for blocks that are part > of a list element are reserved and also that one can do what you are > suggesting here to keep the code-block as part of the list item while at > the same time not

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

I did notice myself that the two-space indentation for blocks that are part of a list element are reserved and also that one can do what you are suggesting here to keep the code-block as part of the list item while at the same time not get those two extra spaces. (By the way, I don't like that

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

Hello, Jonas Bernoulli writes: > This seemed promising at first but let to all kinds of strange behavior. > Code-blocks that are part of a list item turned out to particularly > painful, as here "Finally, you can use ‘-i’ to preserve the indentation of > a specific

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

Thanks for the tip and sorry for the late response. This seemed promising at first but let to all kinds of strange behavior. Code-blocks that are part of a list item turned out to particularly painful, as here "Finally, you can use ‘-i’ to preserve the indentation of a specific code block" means

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Jonas Bernoulli wrote: So here's the ECM: * Node #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (progn (progn foo bar)) #+END_SRC (info "(org) Literal examples") suggests this #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp -i (progn (progn foo bar)) #+END_SRC (16 spaces before bar) which gives

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

So here's the ECM: * Node #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (progn (progn foo bar)) #+END_SRC It doesn't matter whether `bar))` is preceded, in the org file, by two tabs or 16 spaces. In both cases it will be preceded by one tab followed by 7 spaces in the texi file; and by 5 spaces followed by one tab

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

Aloha Kaushal Modi, Kaushal Modi writes: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:53 AM Jonas Bernoulli > wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Nicolas Goaziou >> wrote: >> >> >> Could you provide an ECM? >> >> >> What's an ECM? >> > > I also do not

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

Kaushal Modi writes: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:53 AM Jonas Bernoulli > wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Nicolas Goaziou > wrote: > > Could you provide an ECM? > > What's an ECM? > > I also

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:53 AM Jonas Bernoulli wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Nicolas Goaziou > wrote: > > > Could you provide an ECM? > > > What's an ECM? > I also do not know what ECM means though it has been mentioned in this

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

Hi So Gmail decided that your reply was spam... On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Could you provide an ECM? > What's an ECM? > > Besides, using `org-export-filter-final-output-functions' seems easier > than your set up. > I'll try that,

Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer

Hello, Jonas Bernoulli writes: > I need to ensure that the texinfo exporter generates texi files that use > space for indentation even when the global value of indent-tabs-mode is t. > If tabs are used, then code blocks end up being intended wrong in the final > info