Re: [O] Sticky agenda status?

2012-04-15 Thread Nick Dokos 
Kyle Machulis k...@nonpolynomial.com wrote:

  So far I had one problem with babel, which appears unrelated to sticky
  changes, as org-babel-header-arg-expand seems to be made it into
  default value of org-tab-first-hook, and right that function throws
  some weird error inside of it.
 
 I don't really use babel much, so I'm no good to repro that, but
 everything else seems fine thus far.
 

Eric S. fixed that problem yesterday with commit 

   bc47329 safer equality test in org-babel-header-arg-expand

Nick

Re: [O] Sticky agenda status?

2012-04-14 Thread Kyle Machulis 
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Max Mikhanosha m...@openchat.com wrote:
 I had merged origin/master into max-sticky-agenda, can you try it out
 so that there is more then one person running it? If everything looks
 good I'll push it to master on Monday.

I'm running it now, seems to be working well.

 So far I had one problem with babel, which appears unrelated to sticky
 changes, as org-babel-header-arg-expand seems to be made it into
 default value of org-tab-first-hook, and right that function throws
 some weird error inside of it.

I don't really use babel much, so I'm no good to repro that, but
everything else seems fine thus far.

Re: [O] Sticky agenda status?

2012-04-13 Thread Max Mikhanosha 
At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:54:30 +0200,
Bastien wrote:

 Max, Carsten, please go ahead with the merge against master when you
 think it's time: from what I've tested, the feature is stable/mature
 enough.

I'll update it to master later today, and use it a over the weekend to
see if anything broke, then will commit to master Monday

Regards,
  Max

Re: [O] Sticky agenda status?

2012-04-13 Thread Max Mikhanosha 
At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:59:37 +0800,
Kyle Machulis wrote:
 
 Just curious if the sticky agenda branch is going to land as a feature
 at some point, or if there was some discussion on what's blocking it
 that I'm missing? There was lots of action last month then silence,
 and it looks like the branch has bitrotted against the trunk now. Was
 kinda looking forward to it as a feature. :)
 

I had merged origin/master into max-sticky-agenda, can you try it out
so that there is more then one person running it? If everything looks
good I'll push it to master on Monday.

So far I had one problem with babel, which appears unrelated to sticky
changes, as org-babel-header-arg-expand seems to be made it into
default value of org-tab-first-hook, and right that function throws
some weird error inside of it.

I simply added

(remove-hook 'org-tab-first-hook 'org-babel-header-arg-expand)

to my org mode initialization.

Regards,
  Max