C-c . +1w
Yours,
Christian
On 5/15/12 3:34 PM, SW wrote:
Pressing S-left/right anywhere on a timestamp decreases/increases it by one day.
Pressing S-down/up on a component of a timestamp decreases/increases it by one
unit of that component.
How can we include an easy and quick way to
Christian Moe mail at christianmoe.com writes:
C-c . +1w
This updates the timestamp to be one week from *today*. I want to push the
timestamp one week forward from wherever it is.
SW sabrewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Pressing S-left/right anywhere on a timestamp decreases/increases it by one
day.
Pressing S-down/up on a component of a timestamp decreases/increases it by one
unit of that component.
How can we include an easy and quick way to decrease/increase the
Oops, sorry! Forgot the double-plus.
With point on the timestamp,
C-c . ++1w
Yours,
Christian
On 5/15/12 3:42 PM, SW wrote:
Christian Moemailat christianmoe.com writes:
C-c . +1w
This updates the timestamp to be one week from *today*. I want to push the
timestamp one week forward from
Christian Moe mail at christianmoe.com writes:
Oops, sorry! Forgot the double-plus.
With point on the timestamp,
C-c . ++1w
Ah, that works. Thanks :)
Nick Dokos nicholas.dokos at hp.com writes:
Should I just bind ``C-u 7 S-right`` and ``C-u 7 S-left``?
I wouldn't bother but I'm not you: if you really want to, you can
define a trivial function
(defun sw-one-week-bump ()
(org-timestamp-up-day 7))
and bind it.
snip
SW sabrewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.dokos at hp.com writes:
Should I just bind ``C-u 7 S-right`` and ``C-u 7 S-left``?
I wouldn't bother but I'm not you: if you really want to, you can
define a trivial function
(defun sw-one-week-bump ()
On 15 May 2012 17:25, SW sabrewo...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Aside: Hitting ``M-: (info (emacs) Customizing Key Bindings)`` gives me
an
error about the info file not existing. I installed Emacs 23.2.1 in
CrunchBang
Linux (Debian Stable) and (IIRC) org-mode 7.8.06 via a Debian package.
Any ideas?
Brian van den Broek brian.van.den.broek at gmail.com writes:
A data point:
I've the same broken info system on the ssame version of CrunchBang.
I really like cb, but there are wrinkles like that. The TODO for
solving that hasn't percolated up my list yet
In the meantime, I've posed it on the
SW sabrewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian van den Broek brian.van.den.broek at gmail.com writes:
A data point:
I've the same broken info system on the ssame version of CrunchBang.
I really like cb, but there are wrinkles like that. The TODO for
solving that hasn't percolated up my list yet
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs
documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in
emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case.
The FSF isn't the only one caring about Freedom.
Where more than one entity exists, they are
Nick Dokos nicholas.dokos at hp.com writes:
snip
But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs
documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in
emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case.
Thanks, that's the package :)
FWIW, I think you meant:
(info (emacs) Key Binding
Memnon Anon gegendosenflei...@googlemail.com wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs
documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in
emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case.
The FSF isn't the only one caring
SW sabrewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.dokos at hp.com writes:
snip
But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs
documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in
emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case.
Thanks, that's the package :)
FWIW, I
14 matches
Mail list logo
