Hi, Dude,
Not quite sure why that doesn't work (nor gives an error message about
trying to set the same cell). However, it will work if you specify the
cell range:
@4$4=$sdate + $3::$4=@-1$4+$3
^^
@4$4=$sdate + $3::@5$4..@20$4=@-1$4+$3
^^^
- Christian Moe writes:
Hi, Dude,
Not quite sure why that doesn't work (nor gives an error message about
trying to set the same cell). However, it will work if you specify the
cell range:
@4$4=$sdate + $3::$4=@-1$4+$3
^^
@4$4=$sdate + $3::@5$4..@20$4=@-1$4+$3
Hi Rafal
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:43 AM, The Dude rafal.kowal...@mac.com wrote:
The problem is that when I change the $sdate and recalculate the whole
table with `C-u C-u C-c C-c' only the element @4$4 is set. It seems
like the column formula doesn't apply to the other fields.
This I
- Michael Brand writes:
[...]
Let me suggest one more variant. No row numbers, uses the fact that
the formula for $3 is not evaluated in the header and it circumvents
the bug:
| | WP | Days | Arrival Date |
| || | 2013-06-05 Wed |
|---++--+--|
|
Hi Rafal
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:47 PM, The Dude rafal.kowal...@mac.com wrote:
BTW, what is the difference between `C-u C-c C-c' and `C-u C-*'? I
thought they're doing the same thing.
- `C-u C-c *' or `C-u C-c C-c': recalculate once
- `C-u C-u C-c *' or `C-u C-u C-c C-c'