Re: [O] plain lists folded by default
Rémy Abergel remy.aber...@parisdescartes.fr writes: Hi Org users, do you know how to make plain lists folded by default? ... Currently I need to manually fold the item one by one. Try this (but do read the doc for org-cycle-include-plain-lists for some caveats): --8---cut here---start-8--- #+STARTUP: overview * Section 1 A paragraph here. + item 1 :: description some long text here + item 1.1 :: description comes here let us say that a long text comes here + item 1.2 :: description again let us say that a long text comes here. + item 2 :: some text Another paragraph here. * Section 2 when I unfold Section 1, I get what you can see above (plain lists are unfolded), but I would like to get (by default) something like * My section A paragraph here. + item 1 :: description... + item 2 :: some text Another paragraph here. * Another section Currently I need to manually fold the item one by one. # Local Variables: # org-cycle-include-plain-lists: integrate # End: --8---cut here---end---8--- Eventually being able to do cycling (by pressing [TAB] several time on section 1 in order to fold/unfold the items) would also be nice. I think you get that for free. -- Nick
Re: [O] plain lists folded by default
So I was looking for this article using gmane's web interface and I couldn't see it. Turns out that you followed up on a different article (subject line was auto-fill-mode for text changes (plain-lists) indentation), so this thread got subsumed under that name. Please don't do that: if it is a different question, start a different thread. And conversely, although this is not the case here, if it is the same subject, stay on the same thread: don't start another. Violating either of these principles makes it harder to search the ML for answers. [And I should make it clear that these comments are not directed exclusively at Rémy: in particular, I have been guilty of the second transgression numerous times, so I am included in the target. AFAIK, I have not transgressed against the first principle - although it is arguable that this very note is indeed such a transgression :-)] -- Nick
Re: [O] plain lists folded by default
Hi Nick, I am not sure to understand why today's post has been subsumed to my previous one (entitled indeed auto-fill-mode for text changes (plain-lists) indentation) on the archive page http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-02/threads.html today post appears in a single thread [O] plain lists folded by default. Maybe it is due to the fact I replied to all from one of my old messages, deleting the content and changing the email subject :'-( You mean I should have started from a blank email right? Well sorry for that, and thank you again for your answers. Regards, Rémy. Le 04/02/2014 21:41, Nick Dokos a écrit : So I was looking for this article using gmane's web interface and I couldn't see it. Turns out that you followed up on a different article (subject line was auto-fill-mode for text changes (plain-lists) indentation), so this thread got subsumed under that name. Please don't do that: if it is a different question, start a different thread. And conversely, although this is not the case here, if it is the same subject, stay on the same thread: don't start another. Violating either of these principles makes it harder to search the ML for answers. [And I should make it clear that these comments are not directed exclusively at Rémy: in particular, I have been guilty of the second transgression numerous times, so I am included in the target. AFAIK, I have not transgressed against the first principle - although it is arguable that this very note is indeed such a transgression :-)]
Re: [O] plain lists folded by default
Rémy Abergel remy.aber...@parisdescartes.fr writes: Maybe it is due to the fact I replied to all from one of my old messages, deleting the content and changing the email subject :'-( That would do it :-) You mean I should have started from a blank email right? Yes. Well sorry for that, and thank you again for your answers. No problem (as long as you don't it again :-) ) Nick
