-- Is it possible to use #+lob: with :results output org ?
-- Is it possible for #+lob: to take a string argument ?
Both these were bugs, which are fixed in my development branch -- they
should be merged into org-core by Eric soon.
Those changes are in the main org git repo now, so your
Thanks very much for your reply Eric.
So the :results org feature was there all along.
Searching for raw in org-babel.el shows it's nicely
explained in the doc-string for org-babel-insert-result.
(maybe I should have done that sooner)
I also noticed the :results html and
Thanks very much for your reply Eric.
So the :results org feature was there all along.
Searching for raw in org-babel.el shows it's nicely
explained in the doc-string for org-babel-insert-result.
(maybe I should have done that sooner)
I also noticed the :results html and
Hi Al,
emailorama emailor...@yahoo.com.au writes:
[...]
Also, I've been looking at #+lob: which looks like another
really useful idea,
Yes, #+lob calls are the canonical way to hide source code in
org-babel; with this approach, source blocks are viewed more as function
definitions
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
[...]
-- Is it possible to use #+lob: with :results output org ?
-- Is it possible for #+lob: to take a string argument ?
Both these were bugs, which are fixed in my development branch -- they
should be merged into org-core by Eric soon.
Those
Hi al,
This is currently possible by adding either raw or org to your
results headers. So the following should work.
#+srcname: demoruby
#+begin_src ruby :results output org
require 'date'
puts * heading for demo
puts This demo done on #{Date.today}
puts Try to create a table in org-mode syntax
