No Wayman writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> That's not just org-attach.el, right? The patch does not apply
>> either in the bugfix or in the main branch. Could you resend it,
>> also wrapping the body of the ChangeLog at <80 lines? M-x
>> change-log-mode RET can help. TIA!
>
> Sorry. Didn't
Bastien writes:
That's not just org-attach.el, right? The patch does not apply
either in the bugfix or in the main branch. Could you resend
it,
also wrapping the body of the ChangeLog at <80 lines? M-x
change-log-mode RET can help. TIA!
Sorry. Didn't realize the first patch had
No Wayman writes:
> No Wayman writes:
>
> And one more in org-attach.el.
That's not just org-attach.el, right? The patch does not apply
either in the bugfix or in the main branch. Could you resend it,
also wrapping the body of the ChangeLog at <80 lines? M-x
change-log-mode RET can help.
No Wayman writes:
> Recent changes have introduced byte-comp warnings for unknown
> functions at compile time.
> These warnings are "louder" now that more users are native compiling
> Elisp, so one more reason to avoid them.
>
> See attached patch.
Applied, thanks a lot.
No Wayman writes:
And one more in org-attach.el.
See attached.
>From 21620549a24703697d65c46bc88258cd4b2aaa80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Vollmer
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 15:05:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix byte-comp function warnings
* (org.el, org-attach.el, org-keys.el,
