Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Applied onto main with minor amendments.
Amazing! Thank you so much for guiding me through.
Rudy
--
"It is no paradox to say that in our most theoretical moods we may be
nearest to our most practical applications."
-- Alfred North Whitehead, 1861-1947
Rudolf
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> Please see the attached patch where I attempt to fix every issue you
> pointed out. I also split the tests into smaller functions for better
> maintainability. Please, let me know what you think about my latest
> attempt. Thank you for your guidance!
Applied onto
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>> First of all, checking version should probably be controlled by some
>> customization. Especially when we export to .texi (which does not
>> involve calling makeinfo), not to .info.
>
> I could not figure out how to tell between the two kinds of export.
>
> My
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> After thinking about this for a while, I realized I do not know when I
> will have the time to implement the proposed improvements. So I wonder,
> should we merge what we have, with the feature disabled by default using
> the existing customization variable? That
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> First of all, checking version should probably be controlled by some
> customization. Especially when we export to .texi (which does not
> involve calling makeinfo), not to .info.
>
> This customization might be set to 'auto by default, making ox-texinfo
> check makeinfo
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>> `org-export-with-latex' is a global setting. I do not think that
>> texinfo equivalent should be global. It should only be declared inside
>> ox-texinfo.
>
> That makes perfect sense. Please see the new patch attached to this
> message. What do you think?
> -
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> We are back to the previous comments on the patch itself. You need to
>> address the problem with older versions of texinfo. What will happen
>> if one tries to open a document generated with your patch using old
>> texinfo version? Will it
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> We are back to the previous comments on the patch itself. You need to
> address the problem with older versions of texinfo. What will happen
> if one tries to open a document generated with your patch using old
> texinfo version? Will it render correctly?
I compiled
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Do not wait one month. Just 5 working days. Then, do not hesitate to
>> follow up.
>
> And ... done! So, what happens next?
We are back to the previous comments on the patch itself. You need to
address the problem with older versions of
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Do not wait one month. Just 5 working days. Then, do not hesitate to
> follow up.
And ... done! So, what happens next?
Rudy
--
"The whole science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday
thinking."
-- Albert Einstein, 1879-1955
Rudolf Adamkovič [he/him]
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> FYI, I did receive a reply after the follow-up mail. I signed the papers and
> sent them back to FSF just now. I will revive the thread once FSF does its
> part. Hopefully, I will not wait for yet another (third) month. :)
Do not wait one month. Just 5 working
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Sorry for this delay. Then, can you send them a followup email reminder?
>> If they do not reply within another week, we will contact FSF directly.
>
> Thank you. I sent a followup email just now, FYI.
FYI, I did receive a reply after the
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Sorry for this delay. Then, can you send them a followup email reminder?
> If they do not reply within another week, we will contact FSF directly.
Thank you. I sent a followup email just now, FYI.
Rudy
--
"Logic is a science of the necessary laws of thought, without
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Rudolf Adamkovič, feel free to ask questions if you find the copyright
>> assignment instructions unclear.
>
> I think I need help with the copyright assignment. On April 23, I sent a
> request to ass...@gnu.org, and I have yet to receive a
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Rudolf Adamkovič, feel free to ask questions if you find the copyright
> assignment instructions unclear.
I think I need help with the copyright assignment. On April 23, I sent a
request to ass...@gnu.org, and I have yet to receive a reply as of May 15.
Rudy
--
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>> My Texinfo 6.7 manual does not contain any reference to displaymath
>>> environment, which is used throughout the patch. Where is it coming
>>> from?
>>
>> I do see @displaymath in my TeXinfo 6.8. Also,
>>
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>>> Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>>>
>>> The idea sounds good and having tests is very good. Though I am not
>>> expert in texinfo. CC-ing Nicolas. He is the maintainer.
>>
>> My Texinfo 6.7 manual does not contain any reference to displaymath
>>
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>>
>> The idea sounds good and having tests is very good. Though I am not
>> expert in texinfo. CC-ing Nicolas. He is the maintainer.
>
> My Texinfo 6.7 manual does not contain any reference to displaymath
> environment, which is used
Hello,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>
> The idea sounds good and having tests is very good. Though I am not
> expert in texinfo. CC-ing Nicolas. He is the maintainer.
My Texinfo 6.7 manual does not contain any reference to displaymath
environment, which is used throughout
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> My patch (from almost a month ago) has yet to appear at
>
> https://updates.orgmode.org
This is strange. Marking the patch manually.
In any case, thanks for your contribution and patience.
> Any ideas what to do? Could someone review it?
The idea sounds good and
Hello everyone,
My patch (from almost a month ago) has yet to appear at
https://updates.orgmode.org
Any ideas what to do? Could someone review it?
Thank you!
Rudy
+++ The original message below. +++
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>
>> […], or do I have to tackle the
21 matches
Mail list logo
