On 05/05/2021 01:55, Aleksandar Dimitrov wrote:
Yeah, I know the issue, which is why I rely on XCompose for Latin
scripts. For Cyrillic, alas, that is impossible. It means that I
basically can't control Emacs while using a Cyrillic layout, which is a
pity. I have no good workaround.
Generally,
Hi Aleksandar,
Aleksandar Dimitrov writes:
> [...]
> I must admit that I find the inline org-src notation (of which I
> didn't know yet) somewhat jarring, and certainly less pleasant to
> read. Perhaps we could use a similar mechanism to
> =org-hide-emphasis-markers= to make it more pleasant to
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> On 04/05/2021 14:30, Aleksandar Dimitrov wrote:
>>
>> I don't usually switch input methods. Instead I rely on the X-Server's
>> facilities, including group toggles and XCompose. For example I use
>> XCompose to write all languages with a Latin alphabet without having to
On 04/05/2021 14:30, Aleksandar Dimitrov wrote:
I don't usually switch input methods. Instead I rely on the X-Server's
facilities, including group toggles and XCompose. For example I use
XCompose to write all languages with a Latin alphabet without having to
switch layouts/input methods.
You
Hi,
I must confess I haven't followed all the nooks and crannies of this subject,
but when I browsed through the latest batch of contributions, I noticed that
one simple (=crude) workaround hasn't been mentioned; Indirect buffers.
If one uses one indirect buffer per language, it should be
On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 at 10:29, Joost Kremers wrote:
> It's not really an input method, more like the lack of one. You're probably
> using =set-input-method= to change input methods? Check out
> =toggle-input-method=. :-)
Ah, interesting. A lack of input method. Kind of non-obvious. But the
Hi Juan,
> Thank you very much for your interesting comments. I think your idea of
> applying org-babel to (multi) language support is tremendously
> suggestive and, of course, more org-centric. I suppose it could be
> applied also to languages within the paragraph by inline blocks... I
> really
On Tue, May 04 2021, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> So, on this note, without hopefully hijacking the thread, maybe somebody
> can tell me: what is the "default" input method, i.e. the one I get when
> I start Emacs and haven't changed input methods at all? I see no way to
> get back to it once I have
On Monday, 3 May 2021 at 20:47, Greg Minshall wrote:
> but, for me (maybe i'm missing something?) it means i switch input
> methods.
Which is what I do.
So, on this note, without hopefully hijacking the thread, maybe somebody
can tell me: what is the "default" input method, i.e. the one I get
> I like Aleksandar's solution quite a bit because it also works inline
> e.g. as src_org[:lang de]{Meine deutsch ist zher schlect!}. In
> principle this means that you could leverage the org-babel and org-src
> buffer system to get flyspell results in that language in line as well
> (though I
Hi Joost
> [Not directly related to the OP, but might be useful to know.]
>
> On Mon, May 03 2021, Aleksandar Dimitrov wrote:
>> this sounds very interesting to me, as I, too, mostly write in Org
>> and, sometimes write documents in multiple languages, usually with
>> different varieties of
Hi Greg,
>> Apart from the export, one of my biggest gripes is
>> flyspell. Specifically, the fact that you have to choose one language to
>> spell check the entire document with. That is insufficient in my case.
>
> in case it's relevant:
>
> i also switch between languages. but, for me (maybe
I like Aleksandar's solution quite a bit because it also works inline
e.g. as src_org[:lang de]{Meine deutsch ist zher schlect!}. In
principle this means that you could leverage the org-babel and org-src
buffer system to get flyspell results in that language in line as well
(though I don't think
Hi Aleksandar,
Thank you very much for your interesting comments. I think your idea of
applying org-babel to (multi) language support is tremendously
suggestive and, of course, more org-centric. I suppose it could be
applied also to languages within the paragraph by inline blocks... I
really
[Not directly related to the OP, but might be useful to know.]
On Mon, May 03 2021, Aleksandar Dimitrov wrote:
> this sounds very interesting to me, as I, too, mostly write in Org
> and, sometimes write documents in multiple languages, usually with
> different varieties of either Latin or
Aleks, et al.,
> Apart from the export, one of my biggest gripes is
> flyspell. Specifically, the fact that you have to choose one language to
> spell check the entire document with. That is insufficient in my case.
in case it's relevant:
i also switch between languages. but, for me (maybe i'm
Hi Juan,
this sounds very interesting to me, as I, too, mostly write in Org
and, sometimes write documents in multiple languages, usually with
different varieties of either Latin or Cyrillic.
I have some suggestions:
Apart from the export, one of my biggest gripes is
flyspell. Specifically, the
17 matches
Mail list logo
