Juri Linkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In GNU Emacs 22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2005-03-01
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
draw_fringe_bitmap_1 (w=0xa67bff8, row=0x8f0b548, left_p=0, overlay=149992776,
which=8224) at fringe.c:563
563 period = fb-period;
If
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes:
Juri Linkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In GNU Emacs 22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2005-03-01
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
draw_fringe_bitmap_1 (w=0xa67bff8, row=0x8f0b548, left_p=0,
overlay=149992776,
which=8224) at
Richard == Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard
Richard This patch looks plausible, and gives correct results in the case
Richard you reported. Does it give correct results in general?
Yes, works fine now. Thanks
Klaus
--
--
Trying to get it to use
Lucida Grande, I put
(set-face-font 'default -apple-lucida
grande-medium-r-normal--12-140-75-75-m-120-mac-roman)
You usually shouldn't use `set-face-font'; instead set the various
other face attributes.
Does that mean we should mark set-face-font as obsolete?
Also, looking at the code of set-face-font, it doesn't do aything else than
call (set-face-attribute face frame :font font), so I doubt it will give
much better results.
Well what I mean to say was you shouldn't call set-frame-attribute
:font either. :-)
It's often convenient to set :font
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:23:04 -0500, Stefan Monnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, looking at the code of set-face-font, it doesn't do aything else than
call (set-face-attribute face frame :font font), so I doubt it will give
much better results.
Well what I mean to say was you shouldn't call
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:54:40 +0900, Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what to say; it's the right syntax, and while I can't
test it on a mac, it works fine with roman instead of lucida
grande on X11.
Er, that's times, not roman...
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:34:40 -0600, Tim McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(set-face-attribute 'default nil :family lucida grande :height
120)
With this in my .emacs, Emacs complains on launch about lucida grande:
Wrong type argument: symbolp, lucida grande
I'm not sure what to
,-- On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 11:59:47 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
|
| On trying to find out where the problem could be, I used an evaluated
| version of mark-visible-calendar-date and the problem disappeared.
| (Such a behaviour has happened to me before: with compiled code, it
|
Juri Linkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following xassert caused abort() in get_glyph_face_and_encoding:
xassert (face != NULL);
where face was NULL due to
face = FACE_FROM_ID (f, glyph-face_id);
which returns NULL because glyph-face_id is greater
than f-face_cache-used.
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
