Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:55:48 +0100, Kim F. Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason for the delay is to be able to detect a double mouse-1 click.
Perhaps it shouldn't do that ... WDOT?
Is it different than Emacs normally deals with double clicks?
Glenn Morris writes:
Recent code has added diary-redraw-calendar to
write-contents-functions in the buffer associated with diary-file.
However, this function doesn't preserve point, and it gets clobbered
in mark-diary-entries (provided mark-diary-entries-in-calendar is
non-nil, of
Glenn Morris writes:
Thanks - I put the save-excursion in redraw-calendar itself. For
some reason I though with-current-buffer would preserve point.
This save-excursion can't do anything meaningful to preserve point in
the calendar buffer can it? (I mean because the calendar buffer
* Kenichi Handa (2005-03-09) writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The guillemets , , and should all be punctuation. The single
ones currently have word syntax, and the double ones are treated as
parens in latin-{1,5,9}.el.
As I don't use those
The guillemets , , and should all be punctuation. The single
ones currently have word syntax, and the double ones are treated as
parens in latin-{1,5,9}.el.
As I don't use those characters, I don't know what is
correct. But, it seems that they are used as a pair; isn't
it convenient if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes:
Perhaps changing CLEAR_FACE_CACHE_COUNT from 500 to 2 would
trigger the bug much more often... Can you try that?
If you do this, and the crash doesn't happen, could you try to revert
my change to redisplay_internal in xdisp.c from yesterday, and see
Symptoms:
do:
m-x calendar
The cursor doesnt start out on a date.
This means fancy calendar functions like
(setq today-visible-calendar-hook (quote (calendar-mark-today)))
will break.
heres a backtrace:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil)
On Wed, Mar 09 2005, Miles Bader wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:42:25 +0100, Kim F. Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you click the group name (which has mouse-face and a hand pointer),
yes. Just click anywhere else in the line to navigate in the buffer
itself (or use long click)...
[...]
Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I don't use those characters, I don't know what is
correct. But, it seems that they are used as a pair; isn't
it convenient if we give them paren syntax?
No. The complete set of valid non-ASCII paren pairs from Unicode is
already in characters.el
Symptoms:
Invoke, for instance,
M-x animate-birthday-present
in 21.3 (and the recent 21.4) the animation is smooth. In a CVS emacs
built aftre xasserts were turned back off by default, it's flickery
and slow and sometimes stalls entirely before completing the animation.
Obviously animate is
( a a )
---== - a ==---
aaa
() a
a aa aa
aa.
aa. a
aa . a 2O a. a
a a .
a 6 5O .
:
1. l) a ,
a .
2) a
( a).
2. a ( a
a NetInvestor).
3. a a a a
Omega
Peter Seibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
M-x animate-birthday-present
in 21.3 (and the recent 21.4) the animation is smooth. In a CVS emacs
built aftre xasserts were turned back off by default, it's flickery
and slow and sometimes stalls entirely before completing the animation.
Animate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes:
Peter Seibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
M-x animate-birthday-present
in 21.3 (and the recent 21.4) the animation is smooth. In a CVS emacs
built aftre xasserts were turned back off by default, it's flickery
and slow and sometimes stalls entirely
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I don't use those characters, I don't know what is
correct. But, it seems that they are used as a pair; isn't
it convenient if we give them paren syntax?
No. The complete set of
This is from Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This bug report will be sent to the Free Software Foundation,
not to your local site managers!
Please write in English if possible, because the Emacs maintainers
usually do not have translators to read other languages for them.
Your bug report will be
Matt Hodges wrote:
This save-excursion can't do anything meaningful to preserve point in
the calendar buffer can it?
No, it's complete rubbish! As you and Stefan pointed (ahem) out, I'm
saving point in the calling buffer, not the calendar. Being extra dim
this week, sorry.
But I don't
Miles Bader wrote:
So why is `next-line' so sub-optimal?
It calls line-move.
Sincerely,
Luc.
___
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
Emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
ChrisK [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
What it should look like:
foo := 1
foo + 1 = 2
What it does look like:
foo := 1
foo + 1 = foo + 1
Thanks for pointing this out.
It should be fixed in CVS.
Jay
___
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
