* Christian Schlauer (2005-04-12) writes:
[BibTeX keys]
There is one more questionmark, though: should these keys contain
non-ASCII characters?
[...]
So it would be safer to ``strip accents'', I guess?
You can customize `bibtex-autokey-name-change-strings' for this
purpose:
,
|
On GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-windows98.3000) of 2005-04-11 imenu
creates _two_ entries for, say
static void
describe_abbrev (sym, stream)
Lisp_Object sym, stream;
with the first entry referencing static and the second describe and
only _one_ for
static void describe_abbrev (sym, stream)
Cc: Dan Nicolaescu [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
From: Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:18:18 -0400
In what xterm did you test these? I remember vaguely that I tried in
the past to add more bindings to xterm.el, but abandoned the idea
after I
In what xterm did you test these? I remember vaguely that I tried in
the past to add more bindings to xterm.el, but abandoned the idea
after I discovered that different flavors of Unix had xterm's that
used incompatible bindings.
Luckily, tho the bindings are sometimes different, they
We would also want them to work with oldXMenu, but dropping support
for oldXMenu is also an option we could consider.
I don't understand why it's still there,
It was the default, once upon a time. We are conservative about
desupporting things, especially things that were once the
I updated the defface docstring. Thanks.
___
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
Emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
emacs -nw -q --no-site-file
Then evaluate this:
(frame-parameter (selected-frame) 'background-mode)
The result is: light
Then do: M-x xterm-mouse-mode RET
evaluate the expression again, now the result is: dark
As a result all the standard faces change colors...
Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
emacs -nw -q --no-site-file
Then evaluate this:
(frame-parameter (selected-frame) 'background-mode)
The result is: light
Then do: M-x xterm-mouse-mode RET
evaluate the expression again, now the result is: dark
As a result all the standard faces
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In what xterm did you test these? I remember vaguely that I tried in
the past to add more bindings to xterm.el, but abandoned the idea
after I discovered that different flavors of Unix had xterm's that
used incompatible bindings.
Richard Stallman wrote:
Could someone please look at this question further? I tried to work
on this problem but I could not understand it without more info.
When describe-key is run interactively, echo_message_buffer is set
to Describe key: by message3_nolog,
Where in the code for
10 matches
Mail list logo
