YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:53:23 +0200, Christian Schlauer [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
[...]
This patch, dated from the end of May, has still not been applied to
the trunk -- why not?
I don't apply changes about matter of taste issues only by my
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:53:23 +0200, Christian Schlauer [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
That is caused by `FlashMenuBar' calls in XTflash, and it used to
flash only the menu bar part as its name stands for on Mac OS 9. I
also think the current behavior on Mac OS X is too much.
The following
On Thu, 26 May 2005 18:51:16 +0200, Christian Schlauer [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
I have a friend that runs Emacs on Mac OS X with visible-bell set to
t. On Windows, it flashes the title bar of the frame. Okay. On
GNU/Linux, it flashes the minibuffer and the first line in the
buffer. Okay.
Kevin Gallagher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quitting rings the bell because you do it with the bell character,
C-g. Also, it works by causing something almost indistiguishable from
an error.
Of course we could distinguish them. I do think it's important to do
something when execution is
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quitting rings the bell because you do it with the bell character,
C-g.
That's a relic from ASCII and TTY days.
These days it really doesn't make sense on non-TTY platforms -- it's
more like a bad joke.
Also, it works by causing something
Quitting rings the bell because you do it with the bell character,
C-g. Also, it works by causing something almost indistiguishable from
an error.
Of course we could distinguish them. I do think it's important to do
something when execution is interrupted by C-g so the user can tell the
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: ding - too often (OS X and in general)
Quitting rings the bell because you do it with the bell character,
C-g. Also, it works by causing something almost indistiguishable from
an error.
Of course we could distinguish them. I do think it's
David Reitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does Emacs ring the bell upon user-initiated abort actions?
Because C-g signals a quit, and that calls bitch_at_user --
which I agree is bogus ... there's no need to bitch at anyone
for cancelling a command.
I'm not sure what the best way to fix
On 23 May 2005, at 11:04, Kim F. Storm wrote:
I'm not sure what the best way to fix this, as some users
may like to be bitched at :-)
Doubt that there would be many. And if so, you can't please everybody
- at least one should please the majority and only bitch when there's
something to
