In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> ! (modify-category-entry elt ?\|)))
> >
> > This is questionable. At least, shouldn't we exclude Hangul?
> I don't konw korean, does Hangul has a different char break rule
Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ! (modify-category-entry elt ?\|)))
>
> This is questionable. At least, shouldn't we exclude Hangul?
I don't konw korean, does Hangul has a different char break rule?
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps we should do this:
[...]
> +(#x2010 . #x2027)
> +(#x2030 . #x205E)
For them, I've wrote in the previous mail.
[...]
> +(#xFF01 . #xFF60)
This is already committed.
> ! (modify-category-e
Perhaps we should do this:
*** c:/Emacs/lisp/international/characters.el Thu Oct 26 23:03:06 2006
--- d:/download/emacs--unicode--0/lisp/international/characters.el Sun Oct
29 00:42:10 2006
***
*** 1013,1029
;; 2: East Asian Wide and Full-width characters.
(let ((l
