Is there any reason that $ does not have a `.' (punctuation) syntax
class in sh-mode?
Currently in a buffer you have:
BLAHBLAH=test
$BLAH
If the point is after $BLAH and one invokes dabbrev-expand nothing
happens...
If the syntax for $ were to be changed dabbrev would work.
Any objection
Is there any reason that $ does not have a `.' (punctuation) syntax
class in sh-mode?
Just . would be wrong IMNSHO (because C-M-b wouldn't properly jump over
$BLAH). I'd vote for . p or ' syntax. Not sure between the two.
The current w is clearly wrong and should at least be changed
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any reason that $ does not have a `.' (punctuation) syntax
class in sh-mode?
Just . would be wrong IMNSHO (because C-M-b wouldn't properly jump over
$BLAH). I'd vote for . p or ' syntax. Not sure between the two.
A little bit
Is there any reason that $ does not have a `.' (punctuation) syntax
class in sh-mode?
Just . would be wrong IMNSHO (because C-M-b wouldn't properly jump over
$BLAH). I'd vote for . p or ' syntax. Not sure between the two.
A little bit of testing showed that none of the above required
