On 26 May 2001, Daniel Pittman wrote:
Maybe it's some very strange shell quoting bug in that version of
his shell or something?
Well, the Perl error message shows Perl code that looks like the
original source. Hm. But still, maybe the wrong quote is somewhere
else.
Sven?
kai
--
Kai == Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Sven Utcke wrote:
(Should Tramp assume that any Perl found is a Perl 5?)
Hmm. This, of course, would be guaranteed to break once perl6 is
out, and possibly on some (very few) perl4-only machines...
I guess it's time to
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Sven Utcke wrote:
Right. Any difference in environment between the two?
kogs12/tmp% diff env.tramp env.ssh
LC_TIME, PATH and TERM could be further investigated. Can you make
the problem appear in a `normal' (non-Tramp) ksh by frobbing these
variables?
kai
--
Sven == Sven Utcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the strange thing of course is that it _does_ work with that
particular instance of perl when called from the shell, just not when
called from tramp. This really _is_ weird...
Could it be something odd going on with the line-endings ?
Sven == Sven Utcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the strange thing of course is that it _does_ work with that
particular instance of perl when called from the shell, just not when
called from tramp. This really _is_ weird...
Could it be something odd going on with the line-endings ?
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kai == Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Sven Utcke wrote:
(Should Tramp assume that any Perl found is a Perl 5?)
Hmm. This, of course, would be guaranteed to break once perl6 is
out, and possibly on some (very
Once upon a time, people had Perl 4 and Perl 5 on their system, and
invoking perl5 ran the newer version. I think these days this is
obsolete and Tramp should not check for perl5 anymore. What do you
think?
(Should Tramp assume that any Perl found is a Perl 5?)
kai
--
~/.signature: No such
On 25 May 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote:
On 25 May 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Is there any good reason why the Perl code used by Tramp
does not work with Perl-4 (and why it won't work with Perl-6) ?
I have no idea whether it works on Perl 4. However, since it doesn't
even work on a
Is there any good reason why the Perl code used by Tramp
does not work with Perl-4 (and why it won't work with Perl-6) ?
I have no idea whether it works on Perl 4. However, since it doesn't
even work on a particular instance of Perl 5...
But the strange thing of course is that it _does_
Once upon a time, people had Perl 4 and Perl 5 on their system, and
invoking perl5 ran the newer version. I think these days this is
obsolete and Tramp should not check for perl5 anymore. What do you
think?
I tend to agree --- if only because, on my system, the executable is
called
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Sven Utcke wrote:
(Should Tramp assume that any Perl found is a Perl 5?)
Hmm. This, of course, would be guaranteed to break once perl6 is
out, and possibly on some (very few) perl4-only machines...
I guess it's time to run `perl -v', then. Argh. Sounds like work.
But the strange thing of course is that it _does_ work with that
particular instance of perl when called from the shell, just not
when called from tramp. This really _is_ weird...
Right. Any difference in environment between the two?
kogs12/tmp% diff env.tramp env.ssh
1c1
_=/bin/env
Right. Any difference in environment between the two?
kogs12/tmp% diff env.tramp env.ssh
LC_TIME, PATH and TERM could be further investigated. Can you make
the problem appear in a `normal' (non-Tramp) ksh by frobbing these
variables?
No.
Sven
--
_ __ The
On 25 May 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Sven == Sven Utcke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
But the strange thing of course is that it _does_ work with that
particular instance of perl when called from the shell, just not
when called from tramp. This really _is_ weird...
Could it be something
14 matches
Mail list logo
