"Stefan Monnier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know about the "right" name. It's still considered bad
> practice to use global identifiers that don't have your magic
> prefix.
Hm. I thought that there was precedence for *some* commands without
the magic prefix. (But the magic string o
> "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But it seems to me that the _right_ name would be report-tramp-bug,
> wouldn't it? (And report-gnus-bug and report-cc-mode-bug and so on?)
I don't know about the "right" name. It's still considered bad practice
to use global identifier
"Stefan Monnier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, the precedence (with w3 and ffap) seems to be to provide
> > commands tramp-bug and tramp-submit-bug. I'll do that.
> ^
> You forgot
> "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, the precedence (with w3 and ffap) seems to be to provide
> commands tramp-bug and tramp-submit-bug. I'll do that.
^
You forgot-report
At least, based on M-x apro
"Tom Roche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sure. Maybe tramp-bug-report: the function should not return a bug :-)
Well, the precedence (with w3 and ffap) seems to be to provide
commands tramp-bug and tramp-submit-bug. I'll do that.
kai
--
I like BOTH kinds of music.
"Tom Roche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> FWIW: to improve/ease support, perhaps it would be wise to
>> implement something like ramp-submit-problem-report
Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/31/00 6:30:39 PM >>>
> What do you think about M-x tramp-bug RET?
Sure. Maybe tramp-bug-report: the f
