Bill Janssen writes:
I think I'll finesse this issue with another (appropriate) layer of
indirection.
OK by me (can't bring myself to +1 on a thoughtful finesse. :)
In a Lisp implementation of http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html I'm
working on, I just use symbols named by the
Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Lisp message threading? What's that in aid of, if you can say?
The VM MUA for Emacs and XEmacs.
Ah! I use MH-E, myself.
Bill
___
Email-SIG mailing list
Email-SIG@python.org
Your options:
Some input from Mark Crispin (who wrote that bit about message-ID
normalization in RFC 5256):
no-fold-quote does not exist in the current specification (RFC 5322)
[which obsoletes 2822 - wcj].
I don't know why you think that the brackets should be removed in
no-fold-literal. The brackets
