> > Mmm, strange, does it change anything if you replace the
> >
> > return &NOT_FOUND ;
> >
> > with
> >
> > return 404 ;
> >
> > in line 289 of EmbperlObject.pm ?
>
>
> No, same behavior. I assume that what I needed to do here was change the
> line, and then just do the whole make-install
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> > I have EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE set to base.html, which in turn does Execute
> > (*). The documentation says that if the specified file is not found and
> > EMBPERL_OBJECT_FALLBACK is not defined, then a 404 is returned as
> > normal. However I just get an "internal server
Some new light on the TT performance...
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Linux Hello World Benchmarks...
>
> I've made enquiries and am told that the specific step taken
> Gerald, I am having a problem with [$ sub $] and EmbperlObject. Let me
> say first that this minimal case does in fact work as it should. There
> is something inexplicable going on however in my (much larger) project.
> If you look at this minimal case though I think you will see why I don't
> t
> I have EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE set to base.html, which in turn does Execute
> (*). The documentation says that if the specified file is not found and
> EMBPERL_OBJECT_FALLBACK is not defined, then a 404 is returned as
> normal. However I just get an "internal server error" message, not a
> 404. I se
