Re: SetupSession (was: problems with using embperl sessions from a mod_perl handler)

2001-04-04 Thread Gerald Richter
> >Is it safe to call SetupSession even if the session may already >have been setup? > Embperl doesn't check if the session is already setup. Normaly that doesn't matter, but a second setup will reset the dirty flag of Apache::Session, so if you have change any data before and don't change any dat

Re: Cookie voodoo

2001-04-04 Thread Gerald Richter
> >I have a problem (who doesn't, huh). I've got 2 servers, one running >FreeBSD with Apache 1.3.14 and Embperl 1.3.0, other Linux with Apache >1.3.19 and same Embperl, only mod_perl is somewhat newer. Problem is, that >when i use $udat from FreeBSD it works perfectly and with all clients and >os'

Re: Embperl & Postgres & Session Management

2001-04-04 Thread Gerald Richter
>[21384]Reading /usr/local/apache/htdocs/iportal/test1.html as input using PerlIO ... >[21384]SES: Received Cookie ID: 49c784ae7385ebaf7abde4a203f3bac8 New Cookie ID: 43903564a7b36f84b785a0882afb3974 Session data is NOT modified The session id is received by test1.html, but it generate a new

Re: import of symbols in Embperl pages (was: DBI in Embperl)

2001-04-04 Thread Gerald Richter
>I'm use my module which work with DBI. >I exproted functions in the header this module. >Second page which I make Exec({inputfile => "email.epl"}) don't see >functions from my module but this functions I use in first file which >make Exec. >I try include my module in both epl files and divide. >

Re: Job Postings

2001-04-04 Thread Gerald Richter
>For a second there I thought I had joined the Monster.com mailing list. :) > It's ok to have job offers here on the list (as long as they are Embperl related), but the answer should be by private email GErald - To unsubscrib

Re: $udat initialisation

2001-04-04 Thread Gerald Richter
>Changes in a hash (or any other list-type) in %udat are not >saved because mod_perl (I think it was mod_perl here, not >Embperl) does not see the change. It's Apache::Session > I suppose it only checks values >directly in %udat and therefore sees the same reference to your >anonymous hashtable

Re: Defining subs (was: A newbie question.)

2001-04-04 Thread Gerald Richter
>Yeah, I think I shouldn't put my sub-functions at the bottom. Yes, that's because EMbperl 1.x compiles _and_ executes the code block by block, so it doesn't see the sub definition at the end when it for the first time execute the function call, because the sub didn't have compiled at this time.

Re: A newbie question. -

2001-04-04 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Andy Lim wrote: > Yeah, I think I shouldn't put my sub-functions at the bottom. > Oh, there IS another solution. > Using [* *] instead [- -] or [! !] solves this problem. There are indeed some issues with [* *] which will be solved in Embperl 2. I managed

RE: A newbie question. -

2001-04-04 Thread Erik Arneson
On 04 April 2001, Andy Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder how other embperl users define subfunctions in the same HTML page > or Are they all define sub functions in other files I tend to just use the Embperl pages for displaying the results of things done in separate modules, most of

RE: A newbie question. -

2001-04-04 Thread Andy Lim
Thank you Andre. Yeah, I think I shouldn't put my sub-functions at the bottom. Oh, there IS another solution. Using [* *] instead [- -] or [! !] solves this problem. But I am somewhat reluctant to use this because they says it's experimental and they didn't say to use it to define functions anywh

Re: $udat initialisation

2001-04-04 Thread ___cliff rayman___
___cliff rayman___ wrote: > the tied %udat does a shallow check to see if anything > needs to be stored. i think most of us who use it do something > like this in code that changes %udat: > $udat:{TIME}=time; s/:// > > > this guarantees that the shallow check will be successful and > that the

Re: A newbie question. -

2001-04-04 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:34:26AM -0700, Andy Lim wrote: > The weired thing is, if I define this sub function at the top of this HTML > page, it generates no error at all. It means I get into trouble when I > define sub-functions at the bottom of each web pages. > I also tried embperl's meta comm

Re: $udat initialisation

2001-04-04 Thread ___cliff rayman___
the tied %udat does a shallow check to see if anything needs to be stored. i think most of us who use it do something like this in code that changes %udat: $udat:{TIME}=time; this guarantees that the shallow check will be successful and that the tied %udat is stored in the session. you can invo

Re: $udat initialisation

2001-04-04 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Stéphane Peiry wrote: > [- >$hold{thing} = "Hello"; >$udat{some} = {%hold}; > -] > > [+ $udat{some}{thing} +] > > (I use %hold because.. I cannot initialize directly $udat as > $udat{some}{thing} = "Hello" .. am I missing something..?) That pa

A newbie question. -

2001-04-04 Thread Andy Lim
I've been encountered with the "famous" random undefined sub error. I learned how to fix this error when I call a sub functions from other library files but, look at below test page. I am having problem in calling subfunctions(AddNumber) defined in the same HTML page. The weired thing is, if I def

$udat initialisation

2001-04-04 Thread Stéphane Peiry
Hi Everybody, Are there any known problems with $udat initialisation? As example I have the file 'one.html' which contains the following (Embperl code): [- $hold{thing} = "Hello"; $udat{some} = {%hold}; -] [+ $udat{some}{thing} +] (I use %hold because.. I cannot initialize directly $u