Rudy Lippan wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Daniel Brooks wrote:
Ok, DBD::ChurlPg must have been an earlier version of DBD::Pg or
something, because my copy of DBD::Pg has the exact same code.
That would be my fault. I created mine own copy of DBD::Pg
(DBD::ChurlyPg) for development, and when I
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Daniel Brooks wrote:
> Ok, DBD::ChurlPg must have been an earlier version of DBD::Pg or
> something, because my copy of DBD::Pg has the exact same code.
That would be my fault. I created mine own copy of DBD::Pg
(DBD::ChurlyPg) for development, and when I decided to releas
At Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:19:45 +0200, Michael Stepanov wrote:
> Thank you very much, Angus. I've found a place where defined
> default debug mode. This is a patch to the file embperl.h:
>
> --- /home/misha/tmp/orig/Embperl-2.0b9/embperl.h2003-02-15
> 22:46:31.0 +0200
> +++ /home/misha/t
Well, I have made it back from my train trip and am ready to upload 0.25
to CPAN
if there are no complaints about it.
We can integrate Kee Hinckley's stuff into 0.26 when he gets back from
his plane trips.
Please test this before I upload it to CPAN:
http://www.urth.org/~metaperl/DBIx-Reco
Ok, DBD::ChurlPg must have been an earlier version of DBD::Pg or
something, because my copy of DBD::Pg has the exact same code.
Confusing. Anyway, does anyone have any idea how to fix it? It just
looks like DBIx::Recordset is generating an SQL statement that DBD::Pg
can't deal with.
db48x
Dan
