Re: EmbperlObject Execute Order

2001-05-17 Thread Nicolas Parody
Is there really no way to force Embperl to Execute the (*) part first? Surely this would make sense for most applications and would make things a lot simpler. Also it would make it easier to port from plain CGI? Nico On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:33:46AM +0200, Gerald Richter wrote: > > > > Tha

Re: EmbperlObject Execute Order

2001-05-17 Thread Nicolas Parody
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:33:46AM +0200, Gerald Richter wrote: > > > Your files (that are invoked via Execute ('*') ), defines a method, for > example getstatus, this method returns what ever information is needed, your > status page now can call this method, also the actual file isn't executed

Re: EmbperlObject Execute Order

2001-05-01 Thread Nicolas Parody
Thanks for the quick reply. But unfortunately after looking at the example I still do not know how i could solve my problem. Maybe I didn't describe it very well. I am calling a module function in login.html that checks user name and password and sets the global $user_id. Problem is that the sta

EmbperlObject Execute Order

2001-04-29 Thread Nicolas Parody
Hi, I have been using the EmbperlObject Feature of Embperl and have to say that I love it. However I suddenly arrived at a problem that I didn't have before when using vanilla cgi. I have most of my code in a seperate file and just call the appropriate function in whichever file is called by '

Problem with Embperl/mod_perl/Apache

2001-04-12 Thread Nicolas Parody
Hi, I am not sure if this belongs in the Embperl mailing list but here is my question: I have installed the debian packages for embperl(1.3.0-1) that were compiled in with support for mod_perl. I have an index.epl file which does something like this (simplified version): [- require '/home/htt

Re: Presenting conditional HTML

2001-03-25 Thread Nicolas Parody
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 01:54:05PM +0200, Gerald Richter wrote: > > > > I don't have any great ideas here. The only thing I've come up with > > so far is that you could have a variation on [+ +] which > > conditionally affected the line. Let's call it [? ?]. > > [? $foo ?], > > would result in e

2.0b1 Problem with HTML Comments

2001-03-05 Thread Nicolas Parody
Hi, I noticed this weird behaviour when I upgraded from 1.3b6 to 2.0b1. HTML Comments like this: Are outputed like this: <

Installation with Virtualhosts under Apache

2000-12-06 Thread Nicolas Parody
Hi, I know that my problem is more related to Apache than to Embperl but I was hoping that someone could help me anyway. I am trying to get Apache to use Embperl to interpret all Files ending in *.epl. For that I used this directive just below (outside) my my various Virtualhost definitions:

Switching off HTML Tag recognition

2000-06-27 Thread Nicolas Parody
Hi, Another stupid question from me that I couldn't solve after looking through the documentation. I have file that contains just the following: [+ $stuff +] Note that there are no table tags since these are in a different file. However I keep getting errors like " outside of table".

Why can't I use print?

2000-06-27 Thread Nicolas Parody
Hi, I don't understand why this doesn't work as I expected it. Is there another way of doing this? [- print "hello" -] the output is: -