>
> So just to confirm my understanding:
>
> if a sub uses only [- -] and returns an html value, then it
> can and should be called with [+ +].
> alternatively, the sub can use [+ +] internally and the
> caller can use [- -] to call it.
> just don't mix the two.
>
Yes.
In addition, if you ha
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:59:38 +0200, "Gerald Richter - ECOS GmbH" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > I figured out my problem.
> > I was using [+ my_sub() +] instead of [- my_sub() -] where
> > my_sub was defined using [$ sub my_sub $] ... [$ endsub $]
> >
> > It wasn't obvious to me (nor do i se
>
> I figured out my problem.
> I was using [+ my_sub() +] instead of [- my_sub() -] where
> my_sub was defined using [$ sub my_sub $] ... [$ endsub $]
>
> It wasn't obvious to me (nor do i see it documented
> anywhere), but calling such subs with [+ +] seems to wreak havoc.
>
Using [+ my_sub
I figured out my problem.
I was using [+ my_sub() +] instead of [- my_sub() -]
where my_sub was defined using [$ sub my_sub $] ... [$ endsub $]
It wasn't obvious to me (nor do i see it documented anywhere),
but calling such subs with [+ +] seems to wreak havoc.
-mda
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:59:36 +
Hi,
>
> Does the EmbperlBlocks syntax really ignore everything
> outside of embperl block?
Yes, 100% sure
Gerald
> I don't have a minimal test case yet, but it still seems to
> be randomly rearranging content and disappearing my table
> tags and whatnot.
>
> -mda
>
> ---
