- ECOS
> Cc: David G. (HQ-JF000)[INDYNE INC]; Ed Grimm; embperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Compiling Embperl
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using Fedora 10
> Apache2::BuildConfig was missing in mod_perl-2.0.4-7.i386.rpm
> which was installed.
> I could find it in mod_perl-deve
vember 20, 2009 11:00 PM
To: Gerald Richter - ECOS
Cc: David G. (HQ-JF000)[INDYNE INC]; Ed Grimm; embperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compiling Embperl
Gerald,
As you pointed out it was lack of Apache2::BuildConfig. I
installed it and I could compiled it easily, but make test
TESTARGS=&quo
t; Testparameter:
> offline = 0
> repeat = 2
>
> ERRORS detected! NOT all tests have been passed successfully
>
>
>
>
>
> gerald.rich...@ecos.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Makefile.Pl of Embperl is searching for the module
> Apache2::BuildConfi
programm and send me the output:
-
use Apache2::BuildConfig ;
use Data::Dumper ;
$c = Apache2::BuildConfig -> new ;
print Dumper ($c) ;
-
Gerald
-Original Message-
From: Soltan Safavi [mailto:sol...@mycopa.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:14 PM
To: Wi
($c) ;
-
Gerald
-Original Message-
From: Soltan Safavi [mailto:sol...@mycopa.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:14 PM
To: Williams, David G. (HQ-JF000)[INDYNE INC]
Cc: Ed Grimm; embperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compiling Embperl
Hi David
In the past I could easily install Embp
Ed Grimm; embperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Compiling Embperl
>
>
> Hi David
>
> In the past I could easily install Embperl 2.2 on Fedora 6
> which is RPM-based sytem, why it can't be installed on Fedora
> 10? any Idea?
> I was not successful to manually in
nning
on Fedora?
Good luck.
From: Soltan Safavi [sol...@mycopa.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:38 PM
To: Ed Grimm
Cc: embperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compiling Embperl
Hi Ed,
I am still looking for the solution. Please find below the outp
.
From: Soltan Safavi [sol...@mycopa.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:38 PM
To: Ed Grimm
Cc: embperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compiling Embperl
Hi Ed,
I am still looking for the solution. Please find below the output of
Makefile.PL,
it shows that mod_perl is properly installed but could
Hi Ed,
I am still looking for the solution. Please find below the output of
Makefile.PL,
it shows that mod_perl is properly installed but could find Apache2
Thank you
Soltan
I am using:
httpd-2.2.10
mod_perl-2.0.4
perl-5.10.0
Build with support for Apache mod_perl?(y/n) [y]
Searching for
All perl packages which are provided by your distribution should put
their perl modules in one of the vendor_perl directories (excluding, of
course, the perl package itself and any direct components thereof, which
should put things in the core directories.)
The easiest manner one could make it not
Hi Gerald
I believe mod_perl is installed correctly.
Here I have the content of the @INC
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/
Hi,
Apache::src is part of mod_perl 1, since you use mod_perl 2, it seems that
mod_perl 2 is not detected by Makefile.PL. Maybe it is not fully/correctly
installed?
Gerald
> -Original Message-
> From: Soltan Safavi [mailto:sol...@mycopa.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:11
Hello,
>
> when compiling Embperl 2.2 on Mac OS-X 10.4.8 using the
> built-in apache 1.3.33 a little patch on "eputil.c" has to
> get applied to ensure compiling runs without errors:
>
Thanks for the patch. It's commited into the svn and will go into the next
release
Gerald
** Virus chec
>
> Good. This XML/XSLT stuff is starting to make sense to me, but does
> anybody have links to good resources on it?
xml.com has a lot of resources, introductions and more advanced articles.
Gerald
-
Gerald Richterecos electronic
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> > With this patch, Embperl with XALAN support compiles, tests, and
> > installs fine for me. Wether it works or not, I have no idea; I'm just
> > beginning to expirement with Embperl2 + XML.
> >
>
> If the tests succeed it will work :-)
Good. This XML/XSLT stuff is sta
>
> The point is for those systems that don't have the library in /usr/lib.
> For example, some system could have it under /opt/SUNWxalan/lib or some
> such. We'd probably also want to do something with the include file,
> because in my example above, it's likely in /opt/SUNWxalan/include.
>
Yes
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Gerald Richter wrote:
>> What about checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH, if it's not set, setting it to
>> '/lib:/usr/lib', and then in either case searching LD_LIBRARY_PATH for
>> it? This is a bit more work, but also more general - it's no longer
>> Linux-specific, and it can be used
> What about checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH, if it's not set, setting it to
> '/lib:/usr/lib', and then in either case searching LD_LIBRARY_PATH for
> it? This is a bit more work, but also more general - it's no longer
> Linux-specific, and it can be used for other things that may exist
> elsewhere. I
What about checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH, if it's not set, setting it to
'/lib:/usr/lib', and then in either case searching LD_LIBRARY_PATH for
it? This is a bit more work, but also more general - it's no longer
Linux-specific, and it can be used for other things that may exist
elsewhere. In fact, th
> Currently Embperl 2.0 Beta 6 requires xalan to be compiled from sources.
I downloaded the binary for Linux and use it. I never have compiled it on
Linux (I have compiled it on solaris because there was no binary for the
sun-cc I had to use)
> xalan is not only a big download, but also takes
20 matches
Mail list logo
