Hi Gerald,
Sorry about not replying sooner. Someone hacked into my computers (which
includes my development machine and my mail server) two weeks ago. They
exploited an (apparently) well known vulnerability in my version of named,
and thus gained root access to both my machines. As a result I ha
Hi Neil,
>
> Sorry about not replying sooner.
No, problem!
> Someone hacked into my computers (which
> includes my development machine and my mail server) two weeks ago. They
> exploited an (apparently) well known vulnerability in my version of named,
> and thus gained root access to both my ma
Hi Gerald,
Sorry about not replying sooner. Someone hacked into my computers (which
includes my development machine and my mail server) two weeks ago. They
exploited an (apparently) well known vulnerability in my version of named,
and thus gained root access to both my machines. As a result I ha
Hi Neil,
did you have time to test the new Embperl version? Are the features working
correct and as you expected for you?
Thanks for your feedback
Gerald
P.S. If anybodyelse if using the new features of 1.3b6 I would be interested
in some feedback, so I am sure they are working before I make t
Hi,
>
> There are two features which I think would be good to have in
> EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
>
I think both of the features make sense to me and I will change the
behaviour of EmbperlObject in 1.3b6 accordingly
Thanks for the ideas
Gerald
---
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 12:39:37PM +, neil wrote:
> The problem comes when you have intermediate parent directories (i.e.
> between the current directory and the website root) which may or may not
> have 'file.html' defined - this means that you have to redefine file.html
> all the way up the
Andre Landwehr writes:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:14:59PM +, neil wrote:
> >
> > There are two features which I think would be good to have in
> > EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
> >
> > 1. The ability for Execute() to look up the directory tree if it can't find
> > t
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:14:59PM +, neil wrote:
>
> There are two features which I think would be good to have in
> EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
>
> 1. The ability for Execute() to look up the directory tree if it can't find
> the named file, in the same way that the
