Neil:
What you can do is to enter the name of the sub as a html comment, like
this:
And it is useful to me, to see in the html output waht subroutine
generate the html code.
Carlos Kassab
Neil Gunton wrote:
Hi Gerald,
I found another case that doesn't work as expected in 2.0b10:
[$ sub x
Neil Gunton wrote:
> Hi Gerald,
>
> I found another case that doesn't work as expected in 2.0b10:
>
>
> [$ sub $]
>
>[-
> my ($self) = @_;
>
> print OUT "Hello world";
>-]
>
> [$ endsub $]
>
> This is a simplified example, but it doesn't print anything. When the
> routine is redone as
Hello,
>
> I get a strange behavior when I use a sub that does not contain any [++]
> block:
>
> -
> [$ sub definedSub $]
> [#+ 'hello' +#]
> [- print OUT " IN ROUTINE\n"; -]
> [$ endsub $]
> Here is the output of the routine
