Re: Re: Re: Re: Process exists - Segmentation fault

2008-01-14 Thread abhishek jain
nuary 07, 2008 2:59 AM > > To: Gerald Richter > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Re: Re: Process exists - Segmentation fault > > > > Hi Its me again, > > But still the things are not working right. > > I tried to recompile Embperl and put PerlModule E

RE: Re: Re: Re: Process exists - Segmentation fault

2008-01-09 Thread Gerald Richter - ECOS GmbH
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re: Re: Process exists - Segmentation fault > > Hi Its me again, > But still the things are not working right. > I tried to recompile Embperl and put PerlModule Embperl after > LoadModule embperl_module .. > > Now i

Re: Embperl 2.0 segmentation fault on apachectl configtest

2004-07-23 Thread John P. Gibbons
..(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... Syntax OK (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Th

RE: Embperl 2.0 segmentation fault on apachectl configtest

2004-07-22 Thread Gerald Richter
> >To debug this further I would need a sack backtrace. Do you > know how to > >create it? > > > > > > > > No, but if you point me in the right direction I'm sure I can do it. > Rebuild with debug options. In Embperl directory perl Makefile.PL debug make install Then run gdb /path/to/htt

Re: Embperl 2.0 segmentation fault on apachectl configtest

2004-07-22 Thread John P. Gibbons
Gerald Richter wrote: I patched it and it still gives me the segmentation fault during configtest. To debug this further I would need a sack backtrace. Do you know how to create it? No, but if you point me in the right direction I'm sure I can do it. It did however allow "mak

RE: Embperl 2.0 segmentation fault on apachectl configtest

2004-07-22 Thread Gerald Richter
> > I patched it and it still gives me the segmentation fault > during configtest. To debug this further I would need a sack backtrace. Do you know how to create it? > It did however allow "make test" to get > farther where before it complained when trying to load h

Re: Embperl 2.0 segmentation fault on apachectl configtest

2004-07-20 Thread John P. Gibbons
On Jul 20, 2004, at 1:31 AM, Gerald Richter wrote: I have just fixed a similar problem which should also fix your configtest problem. You can use the following patch or the version from the CVS: Hi Gerald, I patched it and it still gives me the segmentation fault during configtest. It did

Re: Embperl 2.0 segmentation fault on apachectl configtest

2004-07-20 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi, > > I recently installed Embperl 2.0b11 to experiment with it and have > encountered the apachectl configtest segmentation fault that others > have mentioned. Gerald, you said (in a list post from October 2002): > I have just fixed a similar problem which should also fix

Embperl 2.0 segmentation fault on apachectl configtest

2004-07-19 Thread John P. Gibbons
Hi, I recently installed Embperl 2.0b11 to experiment with it and have encountered the apachectl configtest segmentation fault that others have mentioned. Gerald, you said (in a list post from October 2002): >You can savely ignore this. Run the tests with >make test TESTARGS="-

Re: Segmentation fault

2003-11-28 Thread Gerald Richter
> >> Perl itself has some trouble with your $$searchdata. >> > Hmm, is there any way I can find out which part of perl (short of > recompiling perl with debugging turned on)? > Maybe this helps, but I think you will not get much more information. I think somehow the content of $$searchdata is corr

Re: Segmentation fault

2003-11-25 Thread Marc Beyer
Hi Gerald, thank you for your response. Gerald Richter wrote: Perl itself has some trouble with your $$searchdata. Hmm, is there any way I can find out which part of perl (short of recompiling perl with debugging turned on)? This maybe a result of using [* *], because [* *] is experimental in

Re: Segmentation fault

2003-11-24 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi >> >> I'm getting segmentation faults on a Redhat 7.2 machine with Apache... Perl itself has some trouble with your $$searchdata. This maybe a result of using [* *], because [* *] is experimental in 1.3.x . Either replace the [* if ... *] whith [$ if $] or try to change the way $$searchdata i

Segmentation fault

2003-11-24 Thread Marc Beyer
-DHAVE_ROAMING -DHAVE_THROTTLE -DHAVE_AUTH_MYSQL -X -f /etc/apache-debug/conf/httpd.conf [New Thread 1024 (LWP 12443)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 12443)] 0x404a69fa in Perl_av_fetch () from /etc/apache-debug/modules/libperl.so (gdb) bt #0 0x404a6

Re: problem with segmentation fault

2000-11-16 Thread Ilia Lobsanov
FYI, we use Embperl 1.3b5 and 1.3b6 in two different production environments. No problems. ilia. Gerald Richter wrote: > > I don't expect (m)any changes from 1.3b7 to 1.3, so it's safe to use it also > in a production environment > > Gerald

Re: problem with segmentation fault

2000-11-16 Thread Gerald Richter
> > # make testgdb > make: *** No rule to make target `testgdb'. Stop. > 1.2.1 is too old, it doesn't support testgdb > I assume you mean `test gdb': > no, testgdb is right, but you need at least 1.3b5 > > 1032 cd .. > 1033 tar xzvf HTML-Embperl-1.3b7.tar.gz > 1034 cd HTML-Embperl-1.3b7

Re: problem with segmentation fault

2000-11-16 Thread James Lee
-I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i686-linux -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 test.pl loading...ok Testing offline mode... ascii... make: *** [test_dynamic] Segmentation fault (core dumped) > P.S. Which version of Embperl do you are using? 1.2.1 Then, figuring I had

RE: problem with segmentation fault

2000-11-15 Thread Gerald Richter
offline mode... > > ascii... make: *** [test_dynamic] > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > If you have gdb install please run perl Makefile.PL debug make testgdb -> here gdb start (I hope you have installed it), type r -> after you get the SIGSEGV, type share bt and s

Re: problem with segmentation fault

2000-11-15 Thread James Lee
> > Embperl is working fine in that it is building the web pages as I would > > expect it to. However, I see this line in my log file for every page > > that uses Embperl: > > > > [Wed Nov 15 11:33:55 2000] [notice] child pid 18819 exit signal Segmentation &g

Re: problem with segmentation fault

2000-11-15 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, James Lee wrote: > Embperl is working fine in that it is building the web pages as I would > expect it to. However, I see this line in my log file for every page > that uses Embperl: > > [Wed Nov 15 11:33:55 2000] [notice] child pid 18819 exit sign

problem with segmentation fault

2000-11-15 Thread James Lee
Embperl is working fine in that it is building the web pages as I would expect it to. However, I see this line in my log file for every page that uses Embperl: [Wed Nov 15 11:33:55 2000] [notice] child pid 18819 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) I have read the FAQs and many previous

Re: Segmentation fault

2000-08-31 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi, > > make test TESTARGS="--gdb" crashes after > loading... ok > testing offline mode ... > #0 asci... make *** [test_dynamic] Segmentation fault > in this case, run make testgdb then in gdb enter r -> test starts, you should receive the SIGSEGV s BT and

Re: Segmentation fault

2000-08-30 Thread Gerald Richter
ld pid ... exit > signal, Segmentation fault(11) > Does the "make test" work ? If not, run make clean perl Makefile.PL debug make test TESTARGS="--gdb" and send me the stack resulting stackbacktrace. If "make test" succeeds, then it would be very helpfull if y

Segmentation fault

2000-08-30 Thread R. D. Stoll
: PerlModule HTML::Embperl SetEnv EMBPERL_DEBUG 2285 SetHandler perl-script PerlHandler HTML::Embperl Options ExecCGI AddType text/html .epl When I try to get a Embperl-Document test.epl I get a child pid ... exit signal, Segmentation fault(11) Any idea what is going wrong? Thank You very much Rolf