Ok I'll say up front that this is my first time setting up EmbPerl 2 and Apache 2, but
I've used EmbPerl 1.3 for a few years now. Here's my issue, which I just discovered
about an hour ago:
I have an .epl, subs.epl, which renders fine. I have the following line of code that
is dying:
I couldn't make dreamweaver mx recognize .epl files in its wysiwyg mode.
If I rename it to .html, I get the table layout rendered. But with .epl, I
can't.
I downloaded/installed
http://www.engenhosolucoes.com.br/arquivos/DW_Embperl.zip, and have done
all the steps in this message,
http://www.ecos
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Hall, Philippe wrote:
> Ok I'll say up front that this is my first time setting up EmbPerl 2
> and Apache 2, but I've used EmbPerl 1.3 for a few years now. Here's
> my issue, which I just discovered about an hour ago:
I haven't moved to EmbPerl 2 yet, but I've been keeping a
I saw something similar to this in the list archives -- something Gerald responded
with to someone who was having a similar problem (or so it seems), back in 2002. He
said use this:
[- $req = shift -]
[- $path = $req -> component -> cwd -]
If I use this I would have to:
open (FILEHAND
Ed,
Thanks for the information -- the [+ +] issue is a minor annoyance, but I can
understand the pure intentions behind it. When you say chdir was disabled, is it
advised, then, to just use absolute paths for file I/O? And why does this chdir
change not apply to the Execute() function
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:16:48PM +, Ed Grimm wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2004, Hall, Philippe wrote:
> > Another thing I notice (but presumably unrelated): I can't have more
> > than one statement in a [+ +] block any more... is that right? I get
> > a syntax error.
>
> That is correct.
>
> Ap
To get my actual path i am doing this:
$myactualpath = substr($epreq -> param -> filename,0,length($epreq -> param ->
filename)-9);
I hope this helps
CKG
El Jue 27 May 2004 15:18, Hall, Philippe escribió:
> Ok I'll say up front that this is my first time setting up EmbPerl 2 and
> Apache 2, but
El Jue 27 May 2004 16:24, Hall, Philippe escribió:
> I saw something similar to this in the list archives -- something Gerald
> responded with to someone who was having a similar problem (or so it
> seems), back in 2002. He said use this:
>
> [- $req = shift -]
> [- $path = $req -> component -> cw
Hall, Philippe wrote:
> I saw something similar to this in the list archives -- something
> Gerald responded with to someone who was having a similar problem (or
> so it seems), back in 2002. He said use this:
>
> [- $req = shift -]
> [- $path = $req -> component -> cwd -]
>
> If I use this I woul
