On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:30:01PM -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
Great! That shows it is probably working OK. Do you know what board
he tested it with?
No, I don't see that Dewey mentioned it.
Jeff
--
Want fast and easy
With this sequence of patches
fa59679 rtapi_vsnprintf: arm IS_IEEE754
7e58eae rtapi_vsnprintf: Fix float formatting for !IS_IEEE754
37bc194 rtapi_bitops: fall back to implementation based on gcc intrinsics
b34c2ee uspace: use rtapi_get_time to implement rtapi_get_clocks if
Great! That shows it is probably working OK. Do you know
what board he tested it with?
The board is a Universal PWM Servo Controller I've used sinde Mar 2008
http://pico-systems.com/univpwm.html
--
Dewey Garrett
On 07/22/2014 07:52 AM, Dewey Garrett wrote:
Great! That shows it is probably working OK. Do you know
what board he tested it with?
The board is a Universal PWM Servo Controller I've used sinde Mar 2008
http://pico-systems.com/univpwm.html
OK, thanks! Most likely all the devices the ppmc
On 7/22/14 06:12 , Jeff Epler wrote:
the master branch now builds on a Samsung ARM Chromebook and passes all
142 tests.
Woot! I guess...
;-)
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
Want fast and easy access to all the code in
As far as I can tell the P-number in the tooltable is completely
ignored in nonrandom toolchangers.
I can't help feeling that it would be nice if tool_prepare_pocket also
worked on nonrandom machines.
Consider a lathe with a 6-position changer and a stock of 20 tools.
You could leave the tools in
Some info for hal_ppmc running on an HP dc7800 SFF computer
(ebay bargain) tested with debian 7.6 using rtai and rt-preempt kernels:
rt-preempt kernel (and uspace):
lsb_release -sa: Debian Debian GNU/Linux 7.6 (wheezy) 7.6 wheezy
cmdline:
On 07/22/2014 03:19 PM, Dewey Garrett wrote:
system latency histogram (jitter) for a 1mS thread:
http://www.panix.com/~dgarrett/stuff/rtai.png
http://www.panix.com/~dgarrett/stuff/rt-preempt.png
Well, 50 us jitter on a 1 ms thread is 5%, which is getting
to the
level it could affect
